I have a much better picture; click the URL link for this post. I scanned that off the back of the CD case for the TI CD that came with a USB graphlink. Apparently it's not released yet, but the ad indicates it's available.

cool!! i would get it just for the stand!!!

Cool keyboard, but I think TI needs to hire new graphic designers. Eww.

Transfer documents between your computer AND AND TI technology using the free Notefolio computer software...

nice grammar check, guys...

Ok i was shopping around to see if anyone had a beta keyboard and i found myself laughing my arse off after reading this page.

http:// www.amazon. com/exec/ obidos /search -handle- url/ index =electronics &field-keywords =Ti&bq =1/102-2617666 -1896921

No spaces. Everyone MUST read the prices on the 83 and 83+silver LOL

$169 for an SE and $120 for an 83+ ... why so much? At those prices, you're better off getting an 86, or if you're a little richer, an 89 ...
Of course, those are the list prices ... but you're still better off getting the calculators I previously mentioned ...

its 139 for an SE...and 69 for an 83+

The $69 for the TI-83+ is for used ones. They are at $99 new, but out of stock, so I guess TI isn't making new ones. They probably want to eke out more money from the crowd whose schools tell them to get TI-83+'s.

$99 for an 83 & $67 for an 83+? <sob>I LOVE MY 83+!</sob>

You're looking at retail prices. They show those to try to show how they have good prices. dmoz.org/Computers/Hardware/Calculators/ TI_Graphing_Calculators/Vendors (without the space) shows more places to buy TI calcs.

This will probably turn into something like with the connector cables. There is already a working program for it (check URL: It includes, I believe source for both a mouse and a kbd). TI will probably make an inferior product that costs too much.

hold your calc up to your keyboard and look at that one pic that that one guy scanned (few posts above).... THAT KEYBOARD IS FREEKING TINY... your fingers will probably only be able to press 8 buttons at a time.... geez... the palm collapseable keyboard is what they should be aiming for... i actually used it once...

It looks close to a subnotebook's keyboard size to me. You'll be able to type fine.

I think that TI are wasting their time:
I use the QWERTY Ion program on my calc that allows you to turn the calc on its side and type in that way. I have only been using it about two days and I can type pretty fast (though it is still a lot faster to just stick on the ALock and type using those keys).
TI should make some funkier hardware addons, like external memory modules for my 83+ (For apps, they're too big!)
Even cooler would be an on-calc assembler (like TASM).
You can already write asm in HEX on the thing, so why not create an app or similar that compiles 'English' style assembler (you know, stuff like 'ld a,4' or 'out (bport),a'. It is too slow to keep on having to recompile and send the file accross.
BTW, is it true that VTI only supports TI83Plus ROMs up to version 1.10? My calc came with 1.13, and now runs 1.14. The ROM-dump just gets up to 512K then knackers the calc!
Oh, and I just released my first ASM program- a system info program. click the 'Web Page' link to check it out.

No, it supports up to 1.12. 1.13 and 1.14 won't work.

That's wierd. I got a ROM image off of my 1.14 once. It didn't work with vTI, but it didn't screw up my calc.

whats a subnotebook?

A size of laptop...From larger to smallest you have, laptop, notebook, and subnotebook.

Okay, so what is an iBook?

iThink
iWill
bSick

iBook is a notebook version of iMac. (iMac is technically just a laptop in a bubble anyway)

lol

God is on the forum!
All bow to the best programer since Nagel!
w00T!

Thanks, I'm really flattered... What? You weren't talking about me? Oh well.
w00t!

WE ARE NOT WORTHY TO HIM!!! WE ARE SCUMB! WE SUCK!

I wonder if they could get the same people behind the Stoaway keyboard to produce one that's TI compatible.

Your url didn't work, ticalc probably cut off the end of it. I don't see why they have such a low character limit for urls.

Go to the above link, click suggestions, then find the ti-mouse one. It has some stuff about a keyboard, including a driver by DarkAngel of Total Destruction fame.

Ok, click the above link, then add
71.topic
to it. It should work. There is apparently a working driver at http:// thezfiles.ifrance.com/thezfiles/ kbdtsr.zip

I don't see why they don't allow tags like <I> <EM> <B> <STRONG> <OL> <UL> <LI> <BLOCKQUOTE> <A> and <SPAN>.

Because the ticalc.org coders are lazy.

But /code supports those tags....

I think they should allow <SCRIPT> (Muahahaha! I like to make evil javascript effects!)

<SCRIPT><!--
for (a=100;a>=0;a--){
alert("You will receive this message "+a+" more times!);
}
//--></SCRIPT>

need closing quote " in there.

Oh, geez, you're right! *slaps head*

I accidentally messed up the michaelv.org forum (I AM SOOOOO SORRY!) by using layers. Well, i learned that layers are relative to a site and not to a post.



To Michael Vincent: I AM SOOO SORRY ABOUT THAT!

It's people like you that caused me to block HTML on the Radical Software forum...Hopefully I can leave it on michaelv.org though...

Why not this:

<SCRIPT>
<!--
function screwUser() {
alert("You're screwed");
screwUser();
}

screwUser();
-->
</SCRIPT>

Yeah, sure... then people would be loading compiled JSCript viruses on here JUST BECAUSE THEY CAN, not to mention every other exploit POSSIBLE.

Once you have a popular site up and going well, the lazy thing to do is just to leave it. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." That said, I think ticalc should use SlashCode.

But converting everything to Slashcode would be a little time-consuming, wouldn't it? And didn't I hear something about the ticalc staff being lazy?
Besides, the staff is already overworked and can boast that all of their scripts are self-made (in other words, no copy-pasting).

JUST LIKE MINE! WHEeeeeeeeeeeEEeeEeeeEEEEee! (since I got home from school my mind stayed behind...)