| 
| Results |  
| 
| Choice | Votes |  | Percent |  
	| No | 91 | 21.8% |           |  
	| Yes | 327 | 78.2% |                                |  |  
| 
 
| Re: Do you think calculators with computer algebra systems should be allowed on standardized tests? |  
| annihilator_god   (Web Page)
 |  
| 
to all of you who are against letting calcs on tests:
try to figure out the deferential of a 10*10 matrix BY HAND!
 now use your nifty matrix solver on your calc.
 which is easyer?!
 this is the one reason that i worship my calc in algebra2/trig this calc has helped me jump ahead of the rest of the class by 4 weeks. and don't think that i'm just relying on the calc. normally you have to know how to make the problem into a form that is accepted by the calc so you do still have to think.
 |  
| Reply to this comment | 28 February 2000, 03:10 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: Do you think calculators with computer algebra systems should be allowed on standardized tests? |  
| Jeff Meister   |  
| 
I got my calculator really early, in 7th grade. I actually saw a couple of my friends playing games on theirs and thought it was cool. Then I realized I would need one for Algebra next year. So I went out and got an 83. Then I got interested in ticalc.org, programming, got an 89, blah blah blah. But that's not the point.
 I was in really stupid math in 7th grade. I just moved to Maryland, and since I wasn't born in their wonderful stuck-up state they thought I was stupid. Of course there was nothing I didn't already know being taught in that class. So I got my flashy 83, which no one knew what the hell it was except that their older brothers all had them. I aced all the tests, cause the questions were simple arithmatic. Click the button and you get it right.
 
 I got kind of cocky, knowing that I could never fail with my calc by my side. Then I got into Algebra this year (that's right, I'm 13, probably the youngest person here), and everyone had an 83 (they were from reallyreallyreally smart math). Then I got my first test. Sure the 83 helped sometimes, but it didn't do all the problems. The test was engineered so that you couldn't use the calc that much. I really had to think, because the calc couldn't do everything.
 
 The moral of another one of my needlessly long stories: It's fine to have a calculator on a test. If the calculator can do all the work, that's the test-maker's fault for making a number-crunching test that doesn't make you think. Or learn anything, for that matter.
 
 - Jeff
 |  
| Reply to this comment | 28 February 2000, 03:56 GMT |  |  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9
 
 You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
 
 
 |