Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Yes!
|
193
|
52.7%
|
|
No need.
|
62
|
16.9%
|
|
Don't really care.
|
80
|
21.9%
|
|
What's Linux?
|
15
|
4.1%
|
|
Who's TI?
|
16
|
4.4%
|
|
|
Re: Do you think TI should release a all-calculator linking program for Linux?
|
Mislav Bilobrk
|
Yes, ofcourse!
Do they (@TI) get paid by Microsoft(R) for releasing software fow Windows(R)? Or Apple!?
I doubt!
Does every TI-7x/8x/92 calc user have to pay $100-200 for OS on his PC just to be able to use linking program made by TI? Why should we?!?
I believe Linux is worth of their attention.
PS.
I am The First to vote here,
so I am to blame for 100% YES answers (as for now)
|
Reply to this comment
|
7 August 2002, 17:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Why Bother
|
David
(Web Page)
|
Well, you obviously didn't read my follow-up post. A newbie customer only knows about what he sees, and TI isn't about to go supporting third party linking programs in place of their own. Also, it's a matter of principle: companies should support their own hardware. This issue involves many more companies than TI. For example, I just bought a Cannon S750 printer, but since Cannon can't be bothered to release Linux drivers, I am going to have to make due with something else. Sure, I'll still be able to print, but I won't be able to align the print heads and do some of the things that the printer is capable of. It's about time companies started acknowledging Linux, regardless if there is better third-party software or not, because sometimes there isn’t. The new customer doesn’t always know what else is out there, and if the box doesn’t say it will work on Linux, they often assume that it won’t (to be safe). How can TI guarantee that it will work on Linux when they are not responsible for the software that ensures that it will?
|
Reply to this comment
|
30 August 2002, 00:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you think TI should release a all-calculator linking program for Linux?
|
Ronakbhai
|
Yes, that's true. I am a Windows 98 SE, Windows XP, MacOS 7.5.3, MacOS X, Linux, and Unix user, and from my experience with all these operating systems, I do firmly believe that MacOS will be taking the lead in the near future. I can't explain, as there is too much to explain, but it incorporates all the operating systems into one, Unix based stability, Apple based ease of use, and now even Windows based software. (face it, most people used windows for the software, and most businesses found initially that IBM could produce home computers capable of linking with their mainframes, whereas Apple could not) Anyways, the point is, whether they make for Linux or not, it doesn't really matter, as there are better operating systems out there. I voted yes that TI should make a Linux version, but I mean, I don't know of many people that use Linux only, and not another operating system, and if they do, then most offen than not, they have not seen MacOS X, as anyone who sees it, will be truly amazed...
|
Reply to this comment
|
22 August 2002, 18:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you think TI should release a all-calculator linking program for Linux?
|
ericman2000
(Web Page)
|
Amen.
My WinXP partition had serious psycological issues the day after I installed it. I have a hunch it was windowsupdate. By the way, Win32 users, go there now. No reason, just go there. Anyway, my Linux partition has not had a single problem, since I installed it a week ago. In fact, it has worked better than I expected. I was almost positive I could not use at least some of my hardware, but it detected it all and linux can used it all. WinXP, on the other hand, thinks my ADI SoundMax soundcard is from nVidia. Stupid WinXP! Tux rules!
|
Reply to this comment
|
22 August 2002, 00:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Do you think TI should release a all-calculator linking program for Linux?
|
Ronakbhai
|
We could go on for years on which operating systems are best, and we could all give examples. The average man does not go around thinking "Gee! I'm wrong! I just know that I'm wrong!", as most people go around with "What is he talking about! I KNOW that I'm right.", so henceforth, same is to operating systems. This is NOT a personal "everybody convert to Mac" opinion, but the truth. If you look at ease of INITIAL use, Mac wins hands down, stability, then you got ALL the Unix based operating systems (Unix, Linux, MacOS X, and NOT Windows NT nor XP, 'cause if they were unix based, then why do I have to reboot the entire freakin' computer everytime I install something? It is definately NOT unix based, no matter what po boy BGates' company says) Macs by far excell in every aspect, just sadly, Microsoft is just a popular company, I mean, every person wants Microsoft, only 'cause it's well known. Ah well, y'all who love Microsoft to death use em, us few "smarter" folks shall utilize true operating systems such as Unix and MacOS...
|
Reply to this comment
|
22 August 2002, 19:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Do you think TI should release a all-calculator linking program for Linux?
|
Timendus
(Web Page)
|
I really don't understand why the whole world, including me, uses Windows. IT SUCKS.
Is it marketing? Is it compatibility? Is it Microsoft paying companies for only supporting Windows? I don't know, but I do know that every Windows-user hates his own computer. It crashes, gives errors, doesn't start as it's supposed to do, loses data, doesn't detect joysticks, videocards, modems and so on, NEVER EVER does what you want it to do and is incredibly unstable.
Let Gates come up with something new, something WORKING, or admit that his system sucks and release the market to other OS's. That's my vote...
|
Reply to this comment
|
2 September 2002, 13:08 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|