Are They Necessary?
|
Posted on 4 March 1999
The following text was written by Shane
Burgess: I have talked with many fellow classmates and college professors
about using graphing calculators. Some of the questions I asked were as simple as "which
one should I get?" and some were as complex as how to use specific functions on a certain
calculator. But, if a class really doesn't need a graphing calculator, and the instructor
doesn't support their use in a class, then they may just get in the way. Especially if the
user is playing games during class time. Most of the math instructors at the
community college I attend require the use of graphing calculators. This is great, for it
has been proven that when graphing calculators are in the curriculum, they do indeed help
the students understand the necessary concepts faster and more efficiently. They are a tool,
a very powerful tool, and they should not be abused. Graphing Calculators were
designed to help students grasp the concepts of Algebra, Algebra II, and other graphing
concepts. Even though they are capable of playing games, that is not what they were meant
for. Playing games while in a class will be distraction, a disturbance to others, and slow
done the lesson for the class. Many instructors are aware of the fact graphing calculators
can play games, and they won't allow them for the lesson or for the entire class. This is
not what we want to happen. Graphing calculators are an essential tool for
learning difficult concepts. I applaud the teachers that feel as strong as I do about them.
If a student is only playing games on their calculator, then maybe they should have the
privilige of using a calculator taken away. That's correct, using a graphing calculator is a
privilige, not a right. A student can fight and moan about losing their calculator, but if
they were misusing the "tool" then it is fair. Graphing calculator games are great
and a lot of fun. It is okay to have them on the calculator, but to avoid any possible
conflicts, try to follow these general guidlines: - DO NOT play games during
a lecture or during an important lesson. No matter how boring.
- Use the calculator only
when the instructor allows. If the instructor says no calculators, then put the
calculator(s) away.
- Spend more time taking notes by hand and listening to the instructor
during lectures. If you use your calculator to take notes, then type them up after class. It
can be a distraction to others if you are "flaunting" your calculator to take notes.
- If
you are in a class that doesn't require graphing calculators as part of the lesson, PUT IT
AWAY!! Again, this can be a distraction for the user and the surrounding people.
- If you
must play games, play them when you have the time. If you have a test to study for, save the
games for later. Wait until you have the time.
- Graphing calculators are tools. Respect
that, and if necessary, remove the games if they are getting to be too much of a
distraction. Use the calculator for what it was intended.
|
|
Reply to this item
|
Re: Article: "Are They Necessary?"
|
Thomas Hruska
|
I personally find that calculator games are a way to enhance my knowledge of math and development of future programs both for the calculator and PC. For example, take the game Scorched Earth that I made several years ago for the 82. I learned how to use trajectories before I ever took Physics! I have to agree, however, that most people are just playing games to pass the time without aiming to learn. Serious programmers should be allowed to have calculators in class.
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 1999, 03:27 GMT
|
|
They Are Necessary!
|
MoNkEy MaN
|
I completely agree that kids use calculator games to pass the time. although some of the kids like me use their "time on the calculator" wisely and use it strictly for math. usually after A lecture in math I am on my calculator programming some programs that do the fomulas and all that junk that makes it easier to do math. so far I have created a simple shell in TI-BASIC during class that will take your input and show work to whatever you put in to the calculator. so if you think about it these calculators are very useful, but not necessary (if you dont want a good grade in math) In my class, the highest grade of the kids that dont use graphing calculators is a C, so it is necessary if you want good grades
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 1999, 03:47 GMT
|
|
Re: Article: "Are They Necessary?"
|
Adam Winter
|
I completely disagree with your article. You almost sound like a mother telling her children to behave in class, come on! I enjoy playing games in class all the time, not only in math class but a few of my others as well. My teachers who have a problem with it tell me to put it away, and I will not use it in that class anymore. Other teachers do not have a problem with me using it. What's amazing is that I have about the same grades in these classes. I have a 3.75 GPA and am going to the University of Wisconsin at Madison next year. I have a feeling you wrote the article because you are bitter about losing your privledges of using a calculator or something stupid like that.
If you honestly think you will convert people to your strict set of in-class guidelines for paying attention and using your calculator lets just say: You are not the sharpest knife in the drawer, you have a screw loose, or perhaps you don't have both oars in the water.
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 1999, 04:05 GMT
|
|
Re: Article: "Are They Necessary?"
|
George Limpert
(Web Page)
|
These calculators are made for games. Why did TI add assembly language support and more memory. I own a TI-89 and although the 89 has a few added math features, the new commands for pictures and other stuff is for game programmers. Most assembly language programs are games and since TI has added ASM support, they are supporting the game programming community. After years of messing around with TI graphing calculators for years I have come to the conclusion that they were made by programmers for programmers ... game programmers that is.
I get good grades in school and I work on my programming project in all of my classes. Every day in physics, I work on XShell 89 on my calc and I get good grades. It is the responsibility of each calculator owner to decide whether they can get a good grade and still play calculator games or program in class. Most teachers feel the same way. Besides, when I play games, I am awake and at least hearing the lecture. Without my calculator, I would be asleep in most of my classes.
The author of this article apparently can't or won't understand that the TI calculators were intended for games. Calculator games are not distracting in class. Whoever wrote the article probably has never been very bored in class or otherwise they would understand the reason for having games on a calculator.
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 1999, 04:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Article: "Are They Necessary?"
|
TI-89 User
(Web Page)
|
Calculators were not meant for gaming, regardless of what features Texas Instruments has put on them. The TI-89 calculator is no exception. Texas Instruments added assembly language support because it is a popular feature and it can be used to make ANY type of program run quicker than if it was written in basic, game or otherwise. You also bring up the point that TI has added more memory. The added memory is NOT intended solely for game use. It is meant to speed up the calculator and give the calculator room for more advanced data storage and more programs, both games and other types. So, although the TI-89's advanced features, 68K processor, assembly language, extensive memory, and so on DO lend themselves well to game usage, the main purpose of a calculator, regardless of what type (graphing, scientific, $1 cheapies), is to perform CALCULATIONS (hence the name CALCULATOR). Some calculators (such as the TI-89)are designed to do more advanced calculations than others. Calculator designers take that into consideration when they develop new calculators. Anybody who thinks that TI is trying to sell calculators should take a look at their Graphing Calculator Comparison page (click on the link above in this message's heading). You will find aboslutely NO mention of gaming capabilities. If TI was trying to sell the calculators to gamers, they would prominently advertise the gaming capability of their calculators on this page. If you think the 89's power is for games, look at all of the features that the TI-89 has that other TI-8x calculators do not. Gaming capability is not the reason for the power, it is an additional benefit of the power needed for other functions.
|
Reply to this comment
|
5 March 1999, 22:46 GMT
|
|
Re: Article: "Are They Necessary?"
|
Jeff
|
You know what? I'm sick of all these "Calculator games are the great Satan! blah blah blah Fun is BAD" people. They usually say the same things:
Calculators are for Math and nothing else.
Games are bad, don't play games.
Teachers take calcs with games away.
And this post has a few new things to it:
A comprehensive list of what to do/not do (you obviously have to be told, don't you)
the quote "using a graphing calculator is a privilige, not a right."
Look games are always going to be on graphing calcs, teachers don't care if your playing, they won't take the calc away, they won't tell you to stop. Teachers at my school seem to think that the students can decide what they do with thier time/calcs. ticalc.org shouldn't put these articles up on the main site anymore, they've been done to death.
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 1999, 04:22 GMT
|
|
Re: Article: "Are They Necessary?"
|
Seane Shane Burgess
|
When I wrote the article I was trying to make a point, and a specific one. Calculator games are great, and I play them myself. But if they are going to be a disturbance to others and you, then maybe put the calculator away, or remove the games. I have the Finance and Statistic programs on my TI-86, and more games than anything else on my TI-89. Games are great, and learning how to write them is an invaluable tool. But there should be a time for games, and a time for the "tool."
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 1999, 04:52 GMT
|
|
Are They Necessary?
|
UnKnown or Not Given Out
(Web Page)
|
I feel it is not the students fault to play games during or before class. The teacher should plan their teaching around the students and use ways to keep them listening to them. Some ideas might include the use of visual object that are most intrested to younger ages and teens. More hands on work and less talk. If you ask any high school kid that uses the calculators the question about do they feel teachers talk to much and should get more down to business they would say 'getting down to business is more important and will keep the kids listening to them and understanding what is going on. 9 out of 10 people would listen more if the classes were more hands on. Although I could tell ya this but it works. I have a current teacher Mr. Holobek which teachers classes at Lions Township High School (Which personal I think the People at that school suck but) The teacher keeps everyones attention and everyone I know looks forward to going into that class everyday knowing something new and adventures will come out of it. Try it and see the results 4 your self. I would also like to thank you for this time to explain my thoughts on this subject and like to make and ending comment about the programs made 4 the calculators. I personal make several games/programs for the 82,83,85,86,89 and have many program be a hit in the ASM form and have had many program bomb out. You must understand but having this calculator helps me learn more about the future I'm heading in which is programming. With out it I would have not learned ASM. Thank You Again
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 1999, 05:41 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|