Why is everyone trying doors?? Try TEOS!! It's the bomb. I've never had problems with it (I'm not sure about AMS 2.04 though). You should try every shell before you say that assembly doesn't work. It could be because doors has it's own rom calls. TEOS uses actual TIOS functions. Try it!
Bryan

Not only did TI not mention this before it was released (I don't think they did anyway), they also dated the website as May 11, 2000.

Instead of pre-announcing things, they make it look like its been out for a month and we are all idiots for not noticing.

Just some random thoughts,
-Sean

yes, that's true. They'll loose with me, I always visit that damned homepage, just for nothing, or to apretiate the big image of a TI92+....
what a calc !

Haven't tried yet, but I'm guessing that almost all of the programs written using TiGCC in nostub mode probably work on AMS v2.04. Can anyone confirm or deny this? Zeljko?

Wouldn't be so sure on that...

I hope so, it a program is compiled in "nostub" mode. About 95% of TIGCCLIB features are based only on LEGAL TIOS FUNCTIONS, so problems are possible only if AMS 2.04 introduces some radical changes in TIOS routines. But, proving or rejecting this requires a months of testing... Nearly each routine must be checked...

Anyway, I don't like "Doors" mode: I implement it only because users want it.

Actually, I have a program that only compiles in Doors mode. Don't ask me why; I'm not doing anything 'illegal'. However, if I try to compile this in NoStub mode, the linker gives me a message that NoStub mode is not compatible with ROM calls, RAM calls, and libraries.

Well I think it really isn't compatible with libraries and romcalls if you use them in the source. That's one of the restrictions in nostub mode

Mines92+ works on 2.04 if anyone is interested (click on the link above if you have Internet Explorer 4 or better).

Programs written in nostub mode with TI-GCC do indeed work on the new AMS. Anyone who does C programming should upgrade because of the 24k limit (assuming you are programming for nostub instead of doors).

On a sidenote, how is it that AMS 2.04 language localizations have an earlier date than the actual AMS (May 5 versus May 11)?

-Sean

no TI89 version :-(

i don't know about teos but universal os v1.13 works fine and it has 7-level greyscale!!

sorry disregard that last comment it worked fine on vti so i thought it would work in real life but it didn't when i wrote the previous comment i was in the process of flashing and decided to test it out on vti and it worked i was so amazed that i wrote that comment.

Wêll Î døwnløädêd v2.04 tø mÿ TÎ-89 änd nøthïng wørks ønlÿ før ä ¢øûplê øf prøgräms. ßût Î mïss mÿ øld HW 1.00. Î wänt tø døwngrädê mÿ ¢äl¢ûlätør änd ¢än sømêønê plz sênd mê änd ê-mäïl ør dïs¢ûss ït hêrê Î wïll ¢hê¢k thïs frêqûêntlÿ tø sêê. Î nêêd HW.1.00 ïn ä .××û fïlê ør ä .tïb fïlê øn¢ê Î säw ït øn sïtê thst häd thêm lïkê thät. $ø änÿbødÿ gênêrøûs øût thêrê, plz hêlp ûs äll tø gêt øûr øld HW.1.00 bä¢k. Î thïnk êvêrbødÿ nêêds ït. ¥ês v2.04 gøês fästêr, bût før mäth, løøk ät thê tïmê ït täkês tø pûn¢h ïn thê prøblêm änd fïnällÿ wrïtê ït døwn. Ñøbødÿ ¢ärês ïf thê ¢äl¢ûlätør sølvêd thê prøblêm fästêr ør øvêrn [ÇÅTÅLØG] ør [VÅR-LÎÑK] fästêr. Wê äll nêêd HW.1.00 ßÅÇK. LËT$ ÅLL ÐØWÑGRÅÐË

I am assuming that when you say HW 1.00 you mean AMS 1.00? Well if you do, all you have to do is e-mail TI. They sent me AMS 1.00 a long time ago, they will send it to you. Also, this is the only legal way to get it back that I am aware of.

You're talking about Ams 1.00, not HW1. That's different(eh).
HEY ! When you buy a TI89, how do you know if you're getting a HW1 calc or a HW2 one ? I'm going to buy someday a TI92+ and I want a HW2 one. Or should-I-wait for another new calc ? Have you noticed the new Algebra fx2 from Casio ? it's just like TI89 but it doesn't have 3D graph, and some others diferences.

All TI-92+'s are HW2. The only way to get a HW1 TI-92+ is to buy a TI-92 and upgrade it with a Plus module.

There is no sure way to tell for the TI-89 (although, I do remember hearing about 89's that ship with AMS 2.03 having different packages).

-Sean

There is a way to tell on the 89. If it doesn't say in the about screen, it's HW 1.00, if it DOES say, it's whatever it says (I'm staring at mine as I type this, and the first line of About says "TI-89 Hardware Version 2.00")

He meant, how can you tell from the box before you buy it/open it if it's HW1 or HW2.

Did you sneez when you wrote that comment?

I sincerely hope you wrote a script to do that instead of typing in all the characters with the alt key one by one...

- Jeff

I have a HW1 and i have just recently upgraded to rom 2.04. And i have tested almost all of the programs that i have on my calc when i had rom 2.03. I used Universal OS (the latest version), and it works 100% as it did in rom2.03. All we need is maxmem because when you try to install maxmem, it says "This is not a HW1 2.03 Calculator". I am sure it would work if this was not there, I sure hope Julien Muchembled (author of MaxMem and, I think, HW2Patch) updates this very soon. Yo, Julien, we hollarin at ya man! Respond.
laters
-poison