Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
It's ok now - even the filearchivers have a life
|
87
|
32.7%
|
|
I can live with it - just get pending down
|
76
|
28.6%
|
|
Bad! I need lots of new files every day!
|
78
|
29.3%
|
|
Filearchives? ticalc has filearchives?
|
25
|
9.4%
|
|
|
Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
|
Paul Joyner
(Web Page)
|
I think the archivers deserve a little credit. They have been blitzed by new files lately and are probably doing all they can to keep the pending files count from rising any further.
P.S. t00w! t00w! First post. This is my first time doing this.
|
Reply to this comment
|
11 May 2002, 17:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
|
joelt
(Web Page)
|
You're right (about this being a hobby). HIP HIP HOORAY, HIP HIP HOORAY, HIP HIP HOORAY! for the file archivers. There are over 20000 files in the archives. They have been doing a hell of a job recently, especially with all the files. Also, I understand not having time. I did vote on the keep the pending down, but I know that that will happen when 2 things occur:
1: The file archivers get tons of time
2: Less programs are submitted. Until then, the pending will stay up, and I understand. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU for doing such a wonderful job :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
16 May 2002, 02:07 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|