ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Community :: Surveys :: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Results
Choice Votes   Percent
It's ok now - even the filearchivers have a life 87 32.7%   
I can live with it - just get pending down 76 28.6%   
Bad! I need lots of new files every day! 78 29.3%   
Filearchives? ticalc has filearchives? 25 9.4%   

Survey posted 2002-05-11 15:58 by Magnus.

Contribute ideas to surveys by sending a mail to survey@ticalc.org.

  Reply to this item

Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
GurudevDas Account Info

Slow slow slow. Even I have a life, and I do things fast.

(j/k)

Reply to this comment    11 May 2002, 23:11 GMT

Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
mechwarrior111

Meta-archiving?
Maybe someone could write a fancy schmancy script that would automatically update the archives and add new files.

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 00:03 GMT


Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Paul Joyner  Account Info
(Web Page)

Nice idea, but people tend to crash less than computers.

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 04:34 GMT


Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
mechwarrior111

Not if you run UNIX. =)

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 06:23 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Paul Joyner  Account Info
(Web Page)

LOL. Good point.

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 16:35 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
canteloupe32 Account Info
(Web Page)

ASP + SQL server for windows, JSP for UNIX, see more lower comment.

Reply to this comment    13 May 2002, 15:04 GMT

Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Paul Schippnick  Account Info
(Web Page)

Results
Choice Votes Percent
It's ok now - even the filearchivers have a life 20 47.6%
I can live with it - just get pending down 6 14.3%
Bad! I need lots of new files every day! 13 31.0%
Filearchives? ticalc has filearchives? 3 7.1%

LOL

Well, I have something like 30K of TI-85/TI-86 programs that I haven't uploaded yet. These are progams that were simply written primarilly for my own use. Now that the TI-85 and TI-86 are just obsoleted, that is not being made any more. Some of them are going to be uploaded. They are what they are. They are all written in TI calc BASIC. To date all the programs that I did upload (spelling errors and all) were written just for uploading.

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 04:23 GMT


Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
nolekid  Account Info

two things: one, the 86 is not obsolete, just TI has no use for it. (the 82 is not obsolete either). two, I hope you're programs are not stupid text-based games that are just a bunch of menus.

Reply to this comment    24 May 2002, 22:27 GMT

Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Christiffer  Account Info

I may be able to get you an auto update script. The only thing is, why dont they put them up there right when they get them, I dont think it would take that long. I always thought they were checking for (laugh) calculator viruses or something.

(First Post ever!!!)

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 15:23 GMT


Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Chickendude  Account Info
(Web Page)

You must not have been here for very long, because they went through every single file a couple months ago to take out all inappropriate files. Now they check before they are uploaded onto the site to make sure they're OK...

Reply to this comment    14 May 2002, 01:38 GMT

Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
RCTParRoThEaD  Account Info
(Web Page)

12th POST! AND SOMETHING NEW!!! w00t! h00t! I like pickles. I have to go play bagpipes at American University now (on mothers day!)...

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 16:09 GMT


Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Paul Joyner  Account Info
(Web Page)

Bagpipes suck. You should switch to trombone.

t00w!

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 16:36 GMT

Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
RCTParRoThEaD  Account Info
(Web Page)

Trombone swallows. Switch to w00t!

Reply to this comment    12 May 2002, 17:38 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Paul Joyner  Account Info
(Web Page)

w00t! blows. Switch to t00w!

Reply to this comment    13 May 2002, 03:09 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
RCTParRoThEaD  Account Info
(Web Page)

You blow. w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t! w00t!
(I hand typed that!) w00t!

Reply to this comment    13 May 2002, 05:00 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
nolekid  Account Info

I can hand type that, too. see: that that that that that that that that...should I go on? (that was retorical, or however you spell it)

but really, the trumpet is the best instrument of them all.

Reply to this comment    14 May 2002, 01:04 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Chickendude  Account Info
(Web Page)

No, the nose flute is the best.

Reply to this comment    14 May 2002, 01:39 GMT

What do you think of the archive update speed?
benryves Account Info

<britspeak>
'Don't use language you wouldn't hear on U.S. network television.'
What a stupid rule!
And anyway, how can I watch American TV?
I'm from England!
</britspeak?>

Reply to this comment    14 May 2002, 09:21 GMT


Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
RCTParRoThEaD  Account Info
(Web Page)

Shine ya shoe, Guhvna'?

Reply to this comment    14 May 2002, 21:45 GMT


Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Soth Account Info

Well that is jolly good of you old boy. Make sure you do a good job now.

Reply to this comment    24 May 2002, 14:44 GMT


Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Chickendude  Account Info
(Web Page)

I haven't the foggiest what you're talkin' about :)
w00t...!

Reply to this comment    31 May 2002, 22:04 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
astrid smith  Account Info

rhetorical

Reply to this comment    28 May 2002, 01:12 GMT


Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Michael Vincent  Account Info
(Web Page)

You should switch to cello.

Reply to this comment    14 May 2002, 01:21 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
Chickendude  Account Info
(Web Page)

I like the cello, the bag pipe, and the nose flute, but not the band instruments.
!t00w00t!
PALINDROMES!!! (oh no, not again:)

Reply to this comment    14 May 2002, 01:41 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
RCTParRoThEaD  Account Info
(Web Page)

FUNNY GUY!

Reply to this comment    15 May 2002, 04:30 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
RCTParRoThEaD  Account Info
(Web Page)

OOOPS! <mathjmendlbait>i ment chicken!</mathjmendlbait>

Reply to this comment    15 May 2002, 04:37 GMT

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer