Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
It's ok now - even the filearchivers have a life
|
87
|
32.7%
|
|
I can live with it - just get pending down
|
76
|
28.6%
|
|
Bad! I need lots of new files every day!
|
78
|
29.3%
|
|
Filearchives? ticalc has filearchives?
|
25
|
9.4%
|
|
|
Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
|
tge82
|
Please tell me that those who responded "Filearchives? ticalc has filearchives?" were just kidding! :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 May 2002, 21:06 GMT
|
|
Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
|
tge82
|
Please tell me that those who responded "Filearchives? ticalc has filearchives?" were just kidding! :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 May 2002, 21:06 GMT
|
|
Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
|
jason_r_larue
(Web Page)
|
I got a top level post!! (Not that it means anything.)
We need a new survey.
If you are using IE, you can get a palindrome at my url. (I Think...)
|
Reply to this comment
|
5 June 2002, 15:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
|
jason_r_larue
(Web Page)
|
Sorry, the url didn't work... ti added http:// at the beginning.
"I prefer pi" is a palindrome. So is "A man, a plan, a cat, a ham, a yak, a yam, a hat, a canal, panama!"
OK, on topic: I think the update speed is fine for the archives. I think ticalc needs a faster SURVEY update speed. :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
5 June 2002, 15:31 GMT
|
|
Re: What do you think of the archive update speed?
|
Drantin
|
For anyone that doesn't know and uses a 68K calc.
The english version of the Crono Fantasy Beta was released a while ago at http://timetoteam.fr.st
|
Reply to this comment
|
6 June 2002, 17:28 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|