Survey - ticalc.org

Basics	Archives	Community	Services	Programming
Hardware	Help	About	Search	Your Account

Home :: Community :: Surveys :: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?

Results

Choice	Votes		Percent
First Post!	17	11.8%
Woot!	13	9.0%
pi = ...	33	22.9%
1337 5p34k	5	3.5%
AYBABTU	13	9.0%
Pyramid!!!	5	3.5%
10110110 10001010	14	9.7%
Magnus Thong	17	11.8%
Voyage 400	27	18.8%

Survey posted 2004-08-22 03:30 by Morgan.

Contribute ideas to surveys by sending a mail to survey@ticalc.org.

Reply to this item

Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
Brian Gordon (Web Page)
my first comments in #tcpa were AYB-related.
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 00:49 GMT

Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
Merthsoft (Web Page)
I chose the "秺" one :P
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 01:15 GMT

Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
tal_oz (Web Page)
I'd like to know what does 1337 mean in leet (thats what they are writing in right? 5p34k means speak so id like to know what it is. Anyway I voted for pi=... because its just the freatest past time then would come first post! and w00t.
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 03:15 GMT

Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
tal_oz
sorry for being an idiot it means leet (wow i had a brain fart)
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 03:22 GMT

Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
tal_oz
greatest not freatest (another brain fart)
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 03:23 GMT

So THAT'S what that smell is!
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
Man, your brain has serious flatulence problems! Tums, Maalox, and Gas-X appear and commercials start
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 04:52 GMT

Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
"I'd like to know what does 1337 mean in leet" HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! If you had said that in an IRC room, that would have been a bash.org quote for sure.
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 04:50 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
Memwaster
1337=0b10100111001
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 12:14 GMT

�
burntfuse
120d //!!!!!!!!! I actually laughed out loud at that...
Reply to this comment	25 August 2004, 19:37 GMT

Re: �
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
Haha! So did I! :-D
Reply to this comment	26 August 2004, 15:54 GMT

Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
Chivo
What happened to our "[The text of this article has been removed by a news editor due to violation of the acceptable use policy.]" PYRAMID? Did it violate the acceptable use policy? Darn news editors! :P
Reply to this comment	27 August 2004, 21:18 GMT

Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
cries Why was that deleted anyway? I'm curious... oh wait, I'm not supposed to ask that. :-X Oh well, how far did it go? I only saw it when it had four comments on it. Did it get much bigger? And... was a comment actually deleted, or were they all fake? (I know mine was)
Reply to this comment	28 August 2004, 01:47 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
Lewk Of Serthic (Web Page)
Hmmm... Good, I can still post. That's a good sign.
Reply to this comment	28 August 2004, 02:18 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
Yay! wonders what happened down here
Reply to this comment	28 August 2004, 14:30 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
Chivo
Mine was fake. It got to about a dozen comments too.
Reply to this comment	30 August 2004, 16:08 GMT

Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
Lewk Of Serthic (Web Page)
Maybe they did it to be ironic...
Reply to this comment	28 August 2004, 02:44 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Favourite ticalc.org pastime?
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
Mmm... good point, that could have been it
Reply to this comment	28 August 2004, 14:30 GMT

�
burntfuse
Yeah...sort of amusing, in a way...some of the later ones (including mine) said things like [The news editor has been removed by the acceptable use policies because of a violation of the text of the article]. Maybe that was why. :-D
Reply to this comment	29 August 2004, 01:09 GMT

Re: �
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
Haha! That would be pretty funny. Yeah, I bet they did do it to be ironic, as Lewk said. That makes the most sense. But I bet the first comment was actually deleted and the others were just fake. Or maybe not. shrugs
Reply to this comment	30 August 2004, 02:45 GMT

�
burntfuse
But the one who posted the first one just said above that his was fake...so I think all of them were fake. :-)
Reply to this comment	30 August 2004, 21:04 GMT

Re: �
no_one_2000_ (Web Page)
Ahh, you're right... oh well :)
Reply to this comment	31 August 2004, 16:18 GMT

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer