Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Female
|
16
|
2.0%
|
|
Male
|
771
|
98.0%
|
|
|
Re: What is your gender?
|
evangelion
|
I've never seen a nerdy girl in my life. Maybe that's the reason. <sigh>
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 January 2000, 02:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Do GRADES make a nerd?!?
|
MalSyned
|
woo hoo! There's no nerd like a lazy nerd! When you spend at least half of every day in the relentless pursuit of more ways to do nothing, you have to make a choice about what to do for the other half: school work or independant nerd work. You've made the right choice, my son.
(If, on the other hand, you spend your *entire* day doing nerd work, well then.... aw, hell, it's still the right choice.)
MalSyned
P.S. If you detect sarcasm, then I was being sarcastic. if you think my views are serious and justified, then I agree :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 February 2000, 23:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: TI 85
|
bloodshedder
|
I also believe that the TI-85 is a great calculator (despite the lack of RAM). I play games like Super Breakout and Tetris on it all the time, and I've also written a slew of BASIC programs, plus, ported a TI-83 BASIC game to the 85 (boy, that wasn't quick, especially because I had to have them sitting next to eachother, copying line by line by line...). But, sadly, I know of only 1 other student at my high school that uses a TI-85. I'd really like to get an 89 someday, though.
|
Reply to this comment
|
5 February 2000, 19:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: I guess
|
MalSyned
|
FYI: Many calculators, the TIs included (I believe), have to convert all expressions to RPN before they work with them. RPN just makes more sense to computers. However, since we've been trained to understand standard math notation, it's nice that the makers of TI calcs bothered to write the extra code to interpret it.
If you want to understand how RPN works (if you write a lot of code, I'm probably not talking to you), just think of it as function-notation, but backwards, and without the parentheses:
standard:
2+2/3-root(3,5)*3
function notation:
+(2,-(/(2,3),*(root(3,5),3)))
function notation with the function name at the end instead of the begining (e.g. (x)sin instead of sin(x)):
(2,((2,3)/,((3,5)root,3)*)-)+
without the parentheses (they are actually unecessary at this point):
2 2 3 / 3 5 root 3 * - +
That's reverse polish notation.
Wow. that was way, way, way off-topic. Sorry.
-MalSyned
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 February 2000, 23:59 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|