Arena 3D released
Posted by Niklas on 7 October 2002, 15:00 GMT
More 3D goodness: Malcolm Smith just released Arena 3D, a First Person Shooter built using Thomas Nussbaumers FAT Engine for the TI-89, TI-92 Plus and Voyage 200 calculators. The game has a Rocket Arena theme, you can strafe, and special features include a double-speed mode and a "hit find" maneuver (automatically turn to whoever/whetever shot you). More features, options and levels are planned; take a look at Malcolms web page for more information. One small point: being a pre-release, there are still bugs. Malcolm notes one in particular in the readme.txt file, so make sure to backup any important files before you try this out. Update (Niklas): Malcolm has released an Arena 3D SDK (sort of) with everything you need to create your own levels.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Arena 3D released
|
Charlemagne
(Web Page)
|
What's cool (it's on Gemini, too) is that these games have all of these cool graphics and textures and stuff, but they always have to have some original, classic, good-lookin' default text on there somewhere.
>;^)
|
|
7 October 2002, 23:07 GMT
|
|
Re: Arena 3D released
|
Tyrel Haveman
(Web Page)
|
Looks like a great game on the screenshots... but I seem to be having a problem. I copied all the files to my 89 (and archived a the gfx ones), then run arena(), press 2nd to start, I enter in the number of bots, frag limit, and skill.... and I end up right back at the welcome/menu screen! What am I doing wrong?
|
|
8 October 2002, 06:36 GMT
|
|
Re: Arena 3D released
|
<h3m04v+0+r0ph
(Web Page)
|
I hate 3D games! People who disagree need to go outside and play in a real 3D world!
|
|
8 October 2002, 13:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Arena 3D released
|
PolarDPres
(Web Page)
|
opinions can be based on fact, but they themselves are not factual. I can have the opinion that your dead, and until I prove it, its just opinion. I can also have the opinion that your alive, and when I prove it, (you are responding to comments, so your alive, unless some one is posting for you), it becomes fact.
If you followed that, that is amazing (that is an opinion, BTW)
|
|
21 October 2002, 16:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A visitor from another planet accepts your challenge
|
ericman2000
(Web Page)
|
I accept your challenge to prove the Earth does not exist, puny earthling.
Try to follow with your limited intellectual capacity.
Does everyone agree that "everything" is made of so-called atoms? Yes, you do agree. Now, these "atoms" are nothing more than negative, positive, and neutral charges. SO, if "everything" is made of atoms and atoms are nothing more than electric charges, then there is nothing but electric charges in the universe and any "body" in the universe is nothing more than some arbitrary designation to a collection of these charges. The Earth, as you humans describe, does not exist. The only thing in that region of the universe is a collection of charged particles bound by elementary forces.
How about more? Yeah?
You see by interpreting electro magnetic radiation. When you see the "earth," you are really interpreting the radiation of the spinning electrons that make up the atoms that compose the region of the universe named earth. How do you know that the electromagnetic radiation you are "seeing" doesn't come from a more distant source?
And finally, diving into the depths of Sci-Fi... watch the Matrix. Provide evidence that we are not in this Matrix.
Wow! I just applied chemistry and physics to real life! This is not possible. Someone, tell me I was wrong somewhere. Quickly.
|
|
28 October 2002, 07:44 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|