Calculators vs. PDAs
Posted by Nick on 13 June 2002, 01:22 GMT
CNN has recently put out an article (discussion also on Slashdot) regarding the slow but definitely palpable convergence of graphing calculators and PDAs. Since TI has essentially cornered the graphing calculator market (others would be quick to debate that, but it's what I think), the article places major focus on their business strategy (FLASH on the 83+, Voyage 200, and so forth) and its relation to Palm's inclinations towards mathematical applications and suchandsuch. This is definitely worth mulling over and discussing. Go!
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Calculators vs. PDAs
|
Ultra_64
|
Will this PDA thingy be included or featured for the TI-89 too? If so, that'll be cool!
|
|
13 June 2002, 05:17 GMT
|
|
Re: Calculators vs. PDAs
|
dingleberry98
|
Listen, let's face it:
NEITHER THE TI OR THE PALM/POCKETPC PLATFORM IS BETTER
The TIs is the least powerful and least flexible for high end multimedia, but it's cheap and it does its job.
Palms are quite flexible and have a large library of free software available, and can come with a variety of options to suit your needs.
PocketPCs are the kings as far as power but are expensive too. They have the most flexibility and can be easily programmed for. I've actually been working on a TI emulator for this platform.
As you can see, none are completely superior. TIs will probably stay in the classroom, but for more complex portably graphing solutions (such as physics), PDAs will no doubt lead the way.
|
|
13 June 2002, 20:19 GMT
|
|
Re: Calculators vs. PDAs
|
Brett Simmers
|
01000011 01100001 01101100 01100011 01110011 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101111 01100010 01110110 01101001 01101111 01110101 01110011 01101100 01111001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100010 01100101 01110011 01110100 00101110 00101110 00101110 00101110 00101110 00100000 00100000 01000011 01100001 01101110 00100000 01100001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01101111 01110100 01101000 01100101 01110010 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110010 01100100 01110011 00100000 01101000 01100101 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100001 01100011 01110100 01110101 01100001 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01110101 01101110 01100100 01100101 01110010 01110011 01110100 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01110111 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01001001 00100111 01101101 00100000 01110011 01100001 01111001 01101001 01101110 01100111 00111111
|
|
14 June 2002, 04:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Calculators vs. PDAs
|
Brett Simmers
|
Congrats to you who realized that my binary actually does mean something. To those of you who didn't, why are you at ticalc??? This is a site for nerds, and nerds should recognize binary when they see it. Especially being in groups of 8, with 8-bit numbers going up to 255, that being the number of standard ascii characters.... It should've been quite ovbious it was text.
No, I didn't use YourDigitalBuddy, I wrote a VB program to translate back and forth, either with spaces between letters or not. If you want it, IM or email me (info in my profile). I traditionally make my binary without spaces but ticalc has the 40-letter word limit, so I turned on spaces.
01110111 00110000 00110000 01110100 00100001
|
|
15 June 2002, 03:24 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|