Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
No, cheating is wrong.
|
179
|
36.6%
|
|
No, I don't know how to cheat.
|
19
|
3.9%
|
|
Yes, once, and I regret it.
|
47
|
9.6%
|
|
Yes, all the time.
|
244
|
49.9%
|
|
|
Re: Have you ever used your TI calculator to cheat on a test?
|
jestbsemple
|
hmmm.. How exactly do you define cheating on with a graphing calculator? Would formulas in the calc be cheating?
|
Reply to this comment
|
19 November 2000, 03:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Have you ever used your TI calculator to cheat on a test?
|
Vasantha Crabb
(Web Page)
|
At my university, we have an interesting situation, that would lend itself very well to cheating. Multiple exams are held in rooms simultaneously. Now different exams have different restrictions on what you can and can't take in. Checking everyone according to which exam they're doing could be very slow, so they just check you for mobile phones, and trust that you know what you can and can't take. Then they randomy check about five out of one thousand people according to their exams' requirements.
So you could easily walk into the French exam, where you aren't allowed a calc or notes, equiped with your TI-92+, filled with data from a French-Englih dictionary, and you'd have to have pretty bad luck to get caught. However, anyone with any morals would agree that this is very wrong, and wouldn't do it. The examiners trust us, and we shouldn't betray this trust.
A slightly less blatant for of cheating would be taking a TI-89 into a digital electronics exam, where you're only allowed a non-programmable calculator. But you're still cheating, and betraying your lecturers' trust.
But if you're allowed a programmable calculator, how can you cheat with it? Apart from "fake memory clear" programs, there's nothing that you can do that would be cheating. You're allowed to take the calc in, so you're allowed to use it as you see fit.
An extreme case of allowing technology into exams is physics, where you can even take a notebook computer in if you want. Now you might say "That'd be easy! You could scan the whole textbook onto your hard disk!" One of my friends did just that, but he still failed. If you need that much info on an exam, you'll fail, because it shows that you don't understand the concepts behind the subject.
My friend had all the textbook stored in his iBook G3, and he failed. I had roughly six formulae on my TI-82 and I passed. No subject is a mere case of remembering formulae. In fact, in Australia, most exams have the required formulae printed on the final page. It's a matter of knowing which formula to use when. So the only way to cheat with a TI is to take it in when you aren't allowed to, or to pretend to wipe it when you really haven't.
However with an HP calc or an Apple iBook, you have wireless networking capabilities. This lets you work with other students as a team on the exam. This is clearly unfair, as you don't need to understand something that another person on your team knows. In fact, you could merely copy all the answers from one person, knowing none of the subject matter. I believe this is clearly wrong, and have never done it.
Vasantha Crabb
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 November 2000, 04:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Have you ever used your TI calculator to cheat on a test?
|
phill
|
>> It's a matter of knowing which formula to use when.
It's more than just that...it's a matter of knowing the subject matter. Heck....I got an 89 for calculus and physics as a senior in high school last year, and I never once used it on tests in either of those classes, and I hardly ever used during regular classes, either. If you know the subject matter, you are not going to need more than a scientific calc on a high school test (so far I haven't needed more than a scientific calc in college, either)....conversely, if you don't know the subject, matter, a calculator is not really going to help you that much, either.
|
Reply to this comment
|
25 November 2000, 22:35 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|