Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
13 or under
|
23
|
4.4%
|
|
14 or 15
|
131
|
25.2%
|
|
16
|
118
|
22.7%
|
|
17 or 18
|
150
|
28.8%
|
|
19 through 22
|
80
|
15.4%
|
|
23 or above
|
18
|
3.5%
|
|
|
Re: How old are you?
|
Bobman
(Web Page)
|
I myself just turned 14......I've had a TI-83 since I was in 6th grade. I knew how to use it too. I programmed the first chance I got. I later got a TI-89 (HW 1, currently AMS 2.03) before I turned 13. It proved extremely useful to me in my Algerba 1 class because of its algebraic capabilities. I didn't use it to cheat at all....only to check my homework and find the answers to problems I had no idea how to do. The fact that I scored the highest in school in the Algebra 1B exam with only an old TI-82 to use proves this. I don't bother learning ASM because it is not much of a useful skill. I rather spend my time trying to learn C++ or something. I don't think that knowing Motorola 68000 Assembly language will be a useful job quality.....unless you plan to get a job at Palm Computing or something. I'll probably learn it some day.....but for now....I'll concentrate on C++ instead.
P.S.-
I know a fair amount of info about calculators....I'm not here just for the games....unlike SOME people here.
--Ethereale89
|
Reply to this comment
|
11 July 2000, 01:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: How old are you?
|
mr_beans_cool
|
We have a test that we take in school, where I live, called an ISAT, which is an SAT thing for younger kids. In 6th grade, I took the math test and missed 2 questions, at an 8th grade level, which included over 200 questions, and I only used a simple blue, $10.00, TI-math explorer calculator.
|
Reply to this comment
|
13 July 2000, 19:54 GMT
|
|
Re: How old are you?
|
Cuco
|
I can't see why you would need a calculator when you're only 12-13-14 years old?! No way is the math so complicated that you need an advanced calculator to do it. I got my TI-82 when I was 17 and even now (19) I usually use the paper more than the calculator. And I don't think I would need a TI-98 before university, so how can 12 year olds come up with the idea that they need a TI-89??!!
Cuco
|
Reply to this comment
|
11 July 2000, 01:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: How old are you?
|
Will Stokes
(Web Page)
|
I'm 19, and will be turning 20 in less than a month. DAMN I'm old around here! Ok, hrmm. I had an 81. Then saw a friends games on his 82, played with my 81 and got it to do silly stuff, then got an 85. Played with my 85, wrote literally 50 games for it, even with fast graphics. But it got to slow. So I started learning asm. It sucked. So I went back to basic for another 6 months. Then sophomore year in high school I tried it again. Got hello world to work again, and then got simple text to move around the screen. Got key pressing to work, make a tick-tack-toe game, then procedded to make a graphical racing game for ZShell and then Usgard. I later started a side-scroller, because I thoguht I could do better than Jimmy Mardell and some guy making mario (little did I realize how much a feat this would be). Literally wrote the entire sidescroller but never found a small collision bug. Got frustrated, put it down. Came back to it, but never got it working, lost the source code, so gave out the old .85s file anyways. Started a new game, a new racing game, made it ultra modular, wrote a menu engine that could be used in all kinds of stuff, got frustrated with the asm programming cycle (program, link, run, crash, fuck!, take out batteries, on for a few seconds, load usgard again, go back to code, scratch head, try something, link, run, crash, fuck!....) so went back to computer programming. Discoverd C++ this year, and I think I'm never going back. =-( Another one bites the dust. And yet I still read ticalc.org every day, several times a day in fact.
-Will
|
Reply to this comment
|
11 July 2000, 03:12 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: How old are you?
|
meingts
(Web Page)
|
The Integrated series encourages--nay, REQUIRES--a graphing calculator. It probably is not required for geometry, but I do remember having to calculate one-var stats and two-var stats with a calculator for Integrated I, II, and III. Probably this is the only thing people had to use their calculators for. (We were not taught the least-squares algorithm, just the med-med algorithm for fitting data to a function.)
I should add that Integrated II is NOT just about Geometry. It mixes in topics from Algebra, Geometry, discrete math/probability, matrix theory, etc.
Having gone through the Integrated series, I will agree with anyone who says the Integrated program emphasizes too heavily use of a calculator. In fact I'm in college now, and many math professors there forbid the use of calculators, (even) for lower division classes.
And please, don't let yourself become addicted to using your calculator for arithmetic. It would be a really sad thing if you lost the ability to do operations on fractions.
This concludes my post.
-meingts
|
Reply to this comment
|
12 July 2000, 04:29 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|