Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Community - Create a forum
|
79
|
41.6%
|
|
Archives - Further categorize the files to make them easier to find
|
35
|
18.4%
|
|
Archives - Create multiple pages for large file lists (e.g. TI-83+ BASIC games)
|
20
|
10.5%
|
|
General - Centralize tutorials and other content that are spread throughout the site
|
12
|
6.3%
|
|
Search - Allow for more search options (please specify)
|
10
|
5.3%
|
|
Other (Please post your suggestions)
|
13
|
6.8%
|
|
No opinion
|
1
|
0.5%
|
|
ticalc.org is fine the way it is
|
20
|
10.5%
|
|
|
File Rating Abuse
|
Ranman
|
It would be nice to see a method in place to prevent file rating abuses. Currently, a file's rating can be destroyed with out any accountability. This kind of anonymous activity is unfair to the author.
|
Reply to this comment
|
19 January 2006, 06:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: File Rating Abuse
|
Chaomerl
|
Here's my idea. Once a program has been rated thrice, you can only rate it three in either direction, IE if ZARP 1.0 (example program) got rated three times with an average of 7, you could only rate it 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, or 4. Of course, there may be some flaws.
|
Reply to this comment
|
20 January 2006, 22:26 GMT
|
|
Re: What part of the ticalc.org website should be improved?
|
ElementFire
|
I voted to improve the search. There are a great many amazing programs, but finding them takes far too long. Some things to note:
* "Search keyword(s) too short" has to go away. Most of my search terms are indeed too short because they are mathematical/engineering oriented. I do not know if this is feasible.
* We need a more capable advanced search feature that allows us to specify the platform that we're searching for. When I'm looking for vector tools, a huge majority of the results are for more popular platforms like the 83+, and it takes me a while to click through each result to find something for the 89. And that brings me to...
* Show the platform next to each result.
I think that's about it, but I'll add stuff if I remember it. Anyone agree with me? I seem to be the only person who voted to improve the search.
|
Reply to this comment
|
19 January 2006, 14:23 GMT
|
|
Re: What part of the ticalc.org website should be improved?
|
saubue
(Web Page)
|
I've voted "Other", because a kind of database (and it could also be a forum) for developers where they can release betas and post news of their upcoming programs for testing would be a great addition. It could also be organized the way ti-news.net does it.
Boolsoft has already wrote an e-mail to the ticalc.org staff a few months ago.
|
Reply to this comment
|
19 January 2006, 14:36 GMT
|
|
Re: What part of the ticalc.org website should be improved?
|
Kaaiman
|
My suggestions:
Better searching:
* Ability to choose which calculator or OS you want to find programs for
* Ability to choose file type (e.g. ASM shell, FlashApp misc., BASIC Science program, etc.)
Split the BASIC Misc. directories to more specific directories, for example:
* BASIC Communication programs (chat progs, messaging progs)
* BASIC Time programs (clock progs, countdown progs)
* BASIC Security programs (encryptors, passwd progs)
* BASIC Shells (for all those crappy and less crappy TI-Windowses :P)
* BASIC Word processors
|
Reply to this comment
|
19 January 2006, 16:05 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|