Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Yes, I am certain
|
17
|
13.5%
|
|
Yes, very likely
|
9
|
7.1%
|
|
Mmm, probably
|
30
|
23.8%
|
|
No, not likely
|
66
|
52.4%
|
|
No, never, never, never
|
4
|
3.2%
|
|
|
First post??
|
AndySoft
|
Wow, I can't beleive I was here right after a new poll! I got the 3rd vote!
I doubt they will release a new one sure, but they might... Well, actually, you could say they did with the rename of the 73...
If they do, I probably won't get it because I won't have a need for it.
Someone has probably beaten me by now... :\
|
Reply to this comment
|
14 March 2003, 02:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Typo...
|
gnorthey
|
The 86 wouldn't be profitable. I'd never buy onee. The 86 is a marginal step upward compared to the 89. For example, I have a TI83 series calc, and I find that I need more power than the 83 series calcs can offer. What am I going to think about?
First of all, I look at cost, $120 or $160 at OfficeMax (hmm... I think I'll waste more money). But after looking at the qualities of both calcs, the cost seems marginal. One calc has the CAS which could be used in a gazillion math classes compared to the features of the 86. I don't want to buy a calc that will only last me a year or two only to have to buy a newer one.
Say that I can sell my old calcs for 66% of original cost. That would be pretty good. TI 83+ SE then sells for about $86, TI-86 sells for $80 giving me total revenues of $168. Purchases equal $130+120+160 or $410-160+20 (cost of sale and shipping old calcs)= $270 net expense. WHereas, skipping the 86 results in $86 total revenue. $130+160=$290-86=$204 in total expenditures.
The best long run choice is the avoid the 86. If TI makes anything, I would thik it would be inbetween the 86 and 89 with a mid-range price. I doubt people do the math as shown above, but they sort of know it anyway.
|
Reply to this comment
|
15 March 2003, 04:22 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|