TI Connect Software Released
Posted by Eric on 16 December 2001, 01:33 GMT
In what's probably the biggest announcement from TI in a while, the long-awaited TI Connect software has been released. TI Connect is the next generation link software that works with the TI-73, TI-83 Series, TI-89, and TI-92+. It has a new purty interface and makes data transferring much easier than before.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: TI Connect Software Released
|
Kevin Dilks
|
Other than the being able to use USB, the new gui, and automatic backups/updates does TI-connect have anything new over the old linking software?
|
|
16 December 2001, 05:05 GMT
|
|
Re: TI Connect Software Released
|
Tom Behrens
|
Wow, any one notice the large amount of new files in the archive? Screw TI, got ticalc.org!
|
|
16 December 2001, 06:06 GMT
|
|
Re: TI Connect Software Released
|
Joe B
|
why does the file have to be so big. people like me who don't have the internet at home can't download the program because it is to big to fit on a floppy disk. if someone has any suggestions, please let me know
|
|
16 December 2001, 23:23 GMT
|
|
Re: TI Connect Software Released
|
Ed Fry
(Web Page)
|
I finally got a chance of istalling Ti-connect. Here's what I think of it so far.
Pros:
1) Definitly an improvement on the interface. its a lot cleaner and more descriptive.
2) the Group explorer is something they should have added a long time ago. it's better than ungroup a file, look at files and regroup files.
3) the Matrix Editor is another great feature of this, now its possible to edit matrics in a more logical manner than before. this is a godsend since the Slayers Engine (the Ti89-basic RPG engine i've been working on since who knows how long) is 90% matrices, lists and data files.
4) Huge improvement in the Screen capture utility. now you can open pictures without using an external program. it can also send pictures to your calc.
5) supports multiple calcs. All i can say is its about time. i was getting sick of installing 5 versions of basicially the same program.
Cons:
1) No Program editing or viewing. This was the only reason to have the Ti-Graphlink software installed. It says in the readme that it will be added to furture versions but who knows when that will be.
2) No Ti-82, Ti-85, Ti-86 support. I know that these calculators are old and all, but they still should have been supported for at least linking support. Whether Ti likes it or not, there is a lot of these calculators out there, and abandoning them is a big mistake, and in the case of the Ti-82, the os is very identical to the Ti-83.
3) Wierd filename generation. When it extracts files from the Calc to the pc, it makes names like main.abc.89e the dot may confuse some users thinking that abc is the extension rather than the 89e. (this is really apparent when hide extensions of know file types in checked, where it would appear main.abc)
Other than a few cons above. it's a pretty solid replacement for the graphlink software.
|
|
16 December 2001, 23:47 GMT
|
|
Lots of really BAD programs published
|
lord_nightrose
(Web Page)
|
I'd just like to comment on something here, and if the people I mention get upset and decide to flame me, that's their decision.
It seems to me that some people are posting their programs here just to get ranked high on both the downloads list and the most files list. I noticed that two people working together released about 20 new programs, none of which are over 3 lines of code long.
If it really took two people to write a three-line program, I pity those two people and hope they can find help in a group home.
Specifically Rian Mitchell and Stephen Schloterbeck with their God-awfully simple math functions like 'cot' [returns 1/tan(x)], which were either blatantly obvious or actually copied code that was given in a response to a news item, and their keycode finder [a copy of another program I saw before], and so on.
Also, "Joe", Joey Gannon, and AdmiralWu. Wu: Why are you uploading a college textbook chapter by chapter? Why not do it all at once? Is it just to get more downloads? Why else would you do it?
This is really starting to get to me. I'm sure that it bothers other SERIOUS programmers as well to see that people who write dozens of simple one-line programs are getting better rankings than people who make BASIC-accessible C function libraries.
To the people who are doing this: Get a life, and try to program something useful
Thank you. My rant for today is through. Go on with your (so-called) lives.
|
|
17 December 2001, 02:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Lots of really BAD programs published
|
steven schlotterbeck
|
Ok, so you're saying that by making a program that calculates things on a graphing CALCULATOR, it is a bad thing? If you don't want math programs, go to the game section. For the rest of you who may want math programs, by all means take a venture into the math section.
Second, all you looked at is a couple of the math programs. there are other programs too, not all games but if that bothers you maybe you should read english and go into the GAMES section. I made those functions in math class to shorten homework time and have already given them to people in my school. And if anyone should think they are there for downloads, you're either jealous or haven't looked to see that I'm ranked over eight-hundred. If you think I'm a threat, you should look a bit further on down the list, say trying to rant on someone in at least the hundred range.
|
|
3 January 2002, 04:40 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|