Sock It To 'Em: New TI-OS?
Posted by Nick on 13 June 2000, 03:47 GMT
Alright... many (many) people have presented this idea on our comment boards, on our email lists, on IRC, in emails to me, as news items on here, and a partridge in a pear tree. Now, it looks as if a group of people are going to make a serious, gung-ho attempt at it. François Goldgewicht, Jean Canazzi (the author of Bigdyna), and Niklas Brunlid (former staff and the author of Prosit) are looking for assistance in the development of a new TI-OS for the 89 and possibly even the 92 Plus. Below, you will find an ICQ chat I had with François today - it addresses some initial questions I had. My only concern is TI adapting their hardware to not accept such a ROM, but ... yeah. Email François if you're a skilled 68K ASM programmer and you'd like to join the project. Trollou 6/12/200 1:44 PM hi i have something to ask u :) BlueCalx 6/12/200 1:44 PM shoot Trollou 6/12/200 1:46 PM i have a project : i would like to make a rom. i already studied this and i am sure that's possible. this would be in open source, etc. i would like to create a programers group, international coders so i just would like u to post a news in order to help me :) BlueCalx 6/12/200 1:47 PM hrm.. impressive :-) Trollou 6/12/200 1:50 PM it's simple... every coder of the ti-fr group is ready (almost :) ) the project is xplained on ti-fr home page (use babelfish to transalte :) ) the mail is : webmaster@ti-fr.org (name : François Goldgewicht) thx Trollou 6/12/200 1:52 PM u can put the name "jean canazzi" (author of bigdyna) BlueCalx 6/12/200 1:53 PM ok Trollou 6/12/200 1:58 PM other name : niklas brunlid BlueCalx 6/12/200 1:58 PM wow... is this intended for math and stuff too, or just gaming compatibility? Trollou 6/12/200 2:05 PM everything : it will replace the tios :) BlueCalx 6/12/200 2:08 PM okay.... if you make it so the math functions are just as madly elite, then i'll definitely post :) (me being the math geek that i am) Trollou 6/12/200 2:09 PM :) Trollou 6/12/200 2:13 PM at a fisrt time it would be just a big program who stands with the tios... in oder to have maths functions etc. but after we could make uour own types (stack...) BlueCalx 6/12/200 2:14 PM yeah.... i'll be back later, i'm going to take a shower. Trollou 6/12/200 3:06 PM look at ti-fr and go to the comments : u'll see the enthousiasm of the frenchies :)
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Sock It To 'Em: New TI-OS?
|
DNite
(Web Page)
|
I've read quite a bit of the responces to this new ROM and I have to say that public feedback and support would be one thing that could make this the best damned thing to happend to any TI. Giving your comments and suggestions makes it certain that it's not going to be some peice of crap that some corp. made without even talking to the public. It'll be OUR rom. with that said. I have just a couple quick suggestions.
I don't play with the calculator for math, or even for games! I play with it just to program anything. When I'm bored, thats what I do. I havn't done much in the way of ASM programming because there is no way to program ASM and compile it from the calc. This is a definate must. So people won't need to download and install everything to their computer in order to program, they can code, compile, test, and do it all over again.
Basic could be sped up a little bit w/ ASM code (I agree that coding this in C wouldn't do it any g00d).
I'm guessing that since the prosit god is working on this, theres a posibility for some multitasking TI programs! That would simply well.. to put it plainly.. rock!
Inclusion of ALL the TI-OS features would probaly be a big plus, because they are all there for a reason. If you don't include one funtion, feature, command, whatever.. SOMEONE will be upset. If you want a true revolution, you'd have to include everything and add to it.
A crash recovery kinda nthing would be nice. instead of resetting your calc, there could maybe be a key sequence (like CTRL-ALT-DEL) that would let you halt the faulty program or something.
and last but not least.. Don't rush!! Don't worry about getting 'something to the public ASAP' .. I myself don't enjoy downloading something and having it not be complete, or having it be unstable. Take your time, do everything right, and make it stable as posible and just give us a picture every once and a while .. pictures never hurt no 1 x=)
Thats all for my suggestions. Good luck to you!
D.Nite
|
|
13 June 2000, 08:58 GMT
|
|
Re: Sock It To 'Em: New TI-OS?
|
Blade1410
|
The idea for a new Os is WONDERFUL..magnificent in fact. You all have great ideas and all, personally i'm not a programmer but i do understand what you people are talking about and it seems to me that for this project to ever get off the ground, YOU NEED TO COMMUNICATE WITH THE PERSON WHO INITIALIZED IT. Another words there is lack of organization and cooperation. All of you who are posting all these ideas should speak w/the French guy or the staff of TIcalc or who ever and form some kind of commity so you can be organized. That will get you off to a start at least.Instead of all this posting of messeges. This is just a suggestion that i think should be considered by all of you who are programmers and think you can make this work.
|
|
13 June 2000, 09:23 GMT
|
|
Sorry to be negative, but...
|
David Hart
(Web Page)
|
Well, I'm not very active in the TI community these days, but if someone can find a way of replacing the TI-89/92+ ROM possible, I'd be happy to help with the project. I had considered the idea before, but it was far too large a project to do on my own... :-)
The main problem is finding a way to install the ROM on the TI-89. The hardware 2.00 versions don't have the Flash-ROM bug that let's you write to Flash directly. Therefore the only way to install a new OS ROM is to use TI's ROM update system. Unfortunately, TI uses an RSA algorithm (I think) to digitally sign their ROM updates, to protect against people distributing altered ROMs which could permanently lock up the calculator (in theory - in practice, I think all the Flash calculators have a small amount of PROM containing the Flash-ROM updating code, so even if a new OS locked up your calculator, it should still be possible to re-install the original OS - the TI-83+ has this protection, anyway).
If a new OS is to be made for the TI-89, either a way around the Flash-ROM protection has to be found, or TI's ROM signature needs to be cracked. Neither of these tasks are very easy (although given the small amount of time it takes the calculator to check the ROM signature, I can't imagine the signature being very large - certainly no more than 128-bits I'd have thought). I don't think TI will be all that happy if someone cracks their signature, either...
Anyway, I wish those working on this project good luck! It's a beautiful idea - an open source calculator OS! Let's just hope that TI doesn't get too upset...
|
|
13 June 2000, 10:27 GMT
|
|
Self programming?
|
Speed Demon
(Web Page)
|
Can´t you make a compiler for the TI?
so you can programm gamers or programms in ASM on the TI that should be really really fine!
And.... don´t forget the TI-92+ while programming
|
|
13 June 2000, 14:05 GMT
|
|
Re: Sock It To 'Em: New TI-OS?
|
Stephen Overton
|
I think you should be able to customize your OS from the computer then send it to the calc. Say I don't need some of the functions (right now) and want to have moe memory. You could choose what functions you want to remove from the computer and it compiles the new rom and sends it to the calc. I think this could create a lot more space on the calc.
|
|
13 June 2000, 16:25 GMT
|
|
Re: Sock It To 'Em: New TI-OS?
|
mike marantis
(Web Page)
|
ive read some people asking about getting the source from ti. people think that this is a really bad i dea because ti will probably deny the request and shove us aside. what if everyone signed a petition for the source and see what they say. all we want is the freedome to use our calculators the way we want so they realy have no reason to not give it to us because they arent loosing anything and if they decide that they dont like our programs then they will just change the os anyway. then we would have t ask for it again :)
|
|
13 June 2000, 18:08 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|