Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
Posted on 5 March 1999, 03:42 GMT
We are sorry to announce that Bryan Rabeler, a member of our staff for the past two years, will no longer be contributing to the project. While Bryan has played a tremendous role in making our site a success, we are no longer able to collaborate with Bryan in a beneficial way. We wish Bryan the best of luck for the future and once again would like to acknowledge the considerable commitment he has made to the site in the past.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Flinn
|
Whether you guys realize it or not, what Rabeler
did on this site took pretty much no work at all.
Updating the file archives, adding some things
every month or so.. big whoop. Why can't Rabeler update files every day instead of every
week or two? It's stupid.
/Flinn
|
|
6 March 1999, 07:16 GMT
|
|
Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Greg Sharp
|
I think Bryan did a good job. The file were kept up to date, even though there were many of them sent in each day, and Bryan was always there to help. Bryan was one of the only ticalc.org members that really interacted with the TI community as a whole. Thanks for the great work Bryan.
Greg Sharp
|
|
6 March 1999, 09:04 GMT
|
|
Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Harper Maddox
(Web Page)
|
Good Luck Bryan! You did an excellent job at ticalc.org, and the staff seems to be motivated to fill your shoes.
|
|
6 March 1999, 09:09 GMT
|
|
Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Link310
|
Well Bryan, you did a great job here, but I guess it's time to move on, huh? Good luck /w whatever you do next. And to ticalc, keep up the great work, I know the rest of team will do just fine.
ttfn
-Link310
|
|
6 March 1999, 20:55 GMT
|
|
Why is ticalc.org withholding information
|
George Limpert
(Web Page)
|
It seems odd that this news item has been up for 45 hours and has 114 posts. Neither ticalc.org nor Bryan Rabeler have come forward with the story. I think the TI community has a right to know the truth about why such a loyal and dedicated member of the community is no longer with ticalc.org. Doesn't the silence on the part of both parties seem quite odd? I can think of many reasons why Bryan hasn't spoke up but why is ticalc.org keeping silent. Earlier posts by ticalc.org members state they cannot reveal information. None of the ticalc.org members have posted for about 23 hours. Why haven't they broken the silence. I think that the loyal visitors to ticalc.org deserve an answer. Who is handling the hosting and the news/comment system now. There were earlier posts that should have been deleted but haven't. It seems that ticalc.org is neglecting this message board for some reason. What is going on behind the scenes. We don't need suspicions or speculation but truthful answers. I think we deserve answers from ticalc.org. I challange ticalc.org members to respond to this. If you also think that more information should be divulged, please reply to this post. The people have a right to know.
|
|
7 March 1999, 00:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why is ticalc.org withholding information
|
atom
(Web Page)
|
I disagree with the second part of this post. If Bryan left ticalc.org on a bad note, which, from the little information we've been given, seems like the case, then he is doing the right thing by not posting here. If he did post, I don't think he would post in a "beneficial way." He should be commended for restraining himself from posting when such bad things are being said about him. In keeping with the ticalc "professional" style, Bryan seems to be doing the right thing.
You are complaining that other people are speculating about this situation without enough information (eg. "It's because of the TI-Files hack!"), but you seem to be doing the same thing. Your reasoning for why Bryan is not posting here is a guess on your part. Have you talked to Bryan about this matter since he "parted"? It doesn't sound like you're basing your conclusion, that he is not posting since he is a villian, on too little information.
|
|
7 March 1999, 14:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Why is ticalc.org withholding information
|
Glen
|
You know (and I'm trying my best to sound mature and responsible here), if you think for even one second that we aren't going to want to know why this happened, you are the fool on this message board. Also, if you didn't want so many questions asked about it, why the heck did you use the words that you did? I mean think about it, you could have said that Bryan was just going on to bigger and better things, not that there had been conflicts or whatever. I'm am personally not sorry to see him go (as I didn't know him very well), but it WILL be a major loss to the TI community. Bryan did his job to the best of his ability, and besides, all of you that think he did squat around here, think about this: he had school, homework, maybe even a job, and he still had to update the file archives, go through e-mail from hell (he was on every ticalc.org list) and still have a litle time for a life. So please people, have a heart, give Bryan some credit and love, and say farewell (even though I think everyone still would like to know why...).
Glen
|
|
7 March 1999, 17:11 GMT
|
|
Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Anti Anti Anti Anti Eugene
|
I hate people who hate people who hate people who hate people who hate Eugene
|
|
7 March 1999, 01:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Nathan Haines
(Web Page)
|
Well, I'm still here, although I've been doing other things like answering help mail, and beginning to prepare new questions for the FAQ...
I'm happy to answer any questions, but the whole affair with Bryan is an internal matter. I know most everything behind this decision, and frankly, I'd be very happy to discuss it more if Bryan had, but he's keeping quiet, and he tells me he's not angry over it, so that's fine for me.
The community has been told why Bryan is no longer with us. I'm going to stay with Chris' official statement that we were no longer able to collaborate with him in a beneficial matter. That's what happened. A more detailed account is no one's business, and not even my personal friends in real life have been told much more. Certainly no details.
Trust me, you're not missing anything, and we choose not to give any more information, in respect to Bryan.
|
|
7 March 1999, 09:15 GMT
|
|
Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Flinn
|
Now that I think about it, Bryan did a pretty
good job of hacking ti-files. What a bunch of
lamers over there at ti-files... That was his
best accomplishment. I guess that almost makes
up for his lack of caring about ticalc.org,
which is undoubtedly the reason he quit.
Why do I type this? Because you people need a
clue. It's sort of like saving someone from
a car accident. You might as well, because
someone could be videotaping, and you could
be on national TV.
- Daniel Walls
|
|
7 March 1999, 01:38 GMT
|
|
Re: Bryan Rabeler and ticalc.org Part Ways
|
Jonathan Kaus
|
I am going to have to agree completely with the guy who demands information. We would all like to know, and not knowing is going to have the entire community spreading tons of rumours for quite some time. At least until someone comes out about this.
I think ticalc.org, as a group, should come forward, because they are the opganization, as opposed to Bryan Rabeler, a single person. This is not saying that I don't think Bryan should talk about whatever happened as well, but I don't want to wait forever in a stalemate, with Bryan waiting to see what ticalc.org says, and ticalc.org waiting to see what Bryan says.
The suspense is killing us all. Please, give us something substantial.
P.S. As a side note, to ticalc.org, I think your news section should automatically check and post the ip number or hostname of the people as they post to this thing. That would allow us to find out who the rude people in the Eugene thing really are. I think that posts like that are demeaning to both your self and the message board you are posting too. If the people knew that everything they posted could be tied to that person, fewer people would post the dumb, senseless posts we have been seeing on this topic. I may state a fact that throughout the entire history of the ticalc.org news reply system, 'Eugene' has posted many things, a lot of which seem to be unnecessary. However, not once in all of his/her posts did he/she put down an email address, fake or legit. I think something should be done about this. It is definetly an abuse of the liberties ticalc.org has allowed us on this message board.
--Jonathan Kaus
Jedsmeny
|
|
7 March 1999, 02:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Addressing the problem
|
the original Eugene
|
Hey guys...time to face it. I've gotten addicted to posting ever since I discovered the comments lists here at ticalc.org. Since last month, there have some people using my name to post irrelevant material. I'll admit I've posted lots of junk here as well. So, I apologize to everyone here, particularly people I offended directly. This does not mean I'll stop posting, period; I'll just make some more intelligent comments and not post so much.
PS: BTW, I know other message boards that are much more controlled than this but don't take the security measures Jonathan Kaus suggested. They are called the TI-Files message board and the Dimension TI bulletin board. (Not to induce any competition, but still.)
I've posted my email address before, but in case you've missed it, I posted it this time.
Oh, and one other thing to those people with the name "Eugene" in their aliases. I represent myself, no one else represents me, and I represent no one else.
|
|
8 March 1999, 09:03 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|