Icarus releases RPG source; to be hosted soon
Posted on 7 February 1999, 01:28 GMT
Andreas Ess of Icarus Productions has released the source code to an RPG game under development called the Wrath of Zalthar. The game was meant to be for ZShell, but Andreas would like someone to take over the project and convert it to Usgard. Andreas has also released a bug-fixed version of M.C.Mik for the TI-85 (Usgard) and plans to release Bomberbloke within 24 hours. Icarus Productions will soon be hosted at ticalc.org, as they are taking advantage of our new site hosting service. Icarus is also planning a new site design. If you would like more information about this new service, read the news article posted a few days ago or email hosting@ticalc.org.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: Icarus releases RPG source; to be hosted soon
|
Nick M
(Web Page)
|
Great! RPGs are always welcome additions to the archive. Its also nice to see that programming for the 85 is still alive ang going. Keep up the good work.
-Nick
|
|
7 February 1999, 01:38 GMT
|
|
Re: Icarus releases RPG source; to be hosted soon
|
Mike
|
Come on guys, still making games for the 85? Why don't you get an 89 and make some games for it that are really good.
The 85's era has come and passed, look towards the future, the 89.
|
|
7 February 1999, 01:40 GMT
|
|
Re: Icarus releases RPG source; to be hosted soon
|
x1234567x
|
There's a lot of games coming out for the 85 lately... what about the 83?
|
|
7 February 1999, 02:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stupid Teachers
|
David Phillips
(Web Page)
|
Yes, the 82 was and now the 83 is the calculator of choice for the classroom. Why? Because most math teachers are too stupid to learn how to use a better calculator like the 85 or the 86. The 85 is TI's oldest graphing calculator, and it still beats the 82 and 83. Sure, you can argue that they did add a few needed features (like a table) to the 82 and other nice stuff (like statistics and finance) to the 83, but these don't stack up against the whole calc.
You can't beat the 85 (and 86, of course) when it comes to a solver, polynomial solver, simultaneous solver, non-intrusive menus (don't you hate how you can't see what you are doing when you open an 82/83 menu?), unit conversions (a MUST for physics or chemistry), calculus functions, catalog (83 added this, but not as good) and real variable names (not silly one letter names or predefined names).
Sure, it's maybe $20-$40 more, but if you're already going to spend $80-$90 on a graphing calc, you should go ahead and get a good one.
Yes, I made the mistake of buying an 82 as my first calc. I learned everything about it (if you know how to use every single function on a calc, it's time for a new calc), then later bought an 86, and have never regretted it. Immediately after buying an 82, I wished I'd bought an 85 and hated the teacher for telling me and everyone else to buy an 82, just because the teacher was too stupid to learn how to use an 85.
Well, that's my $0.02...
|
|
8 February 1999, 23:23 GMT
|
|
WHAT UP YO!?
|
1natural1
|
So whose gunna be taking over the project, sounds like it would be fun, yes fun indeed. AND another thing, why are people talking about how it's good to have games for calculators when that wasn't even the TOPIC. Honestly, some people and their comments are very unhelpful. (AND YES, I know it's ironic for me to post a message to say that it is unhelpful, so don't tell me this)
|
|
7 February 1999, 02:33 GMT
|
|
1 2 3
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|