Upcoming TI-83 Miscellaneous Programs
|
Post updates on your projects here, or give other authors your feedback on
their works in progress.
When posting about an upcoming program of yours, please include a link to
any relevant information (screen shots, etc.) in the URL field.
To have an entry removed, please
Contact Us.
|
|
Reply to this item
|
publisher for TI
|
phm phm
|
hello i have programmed a paint software that generate str with the code of your picture,str look like that ":line(1,5,20,5) :text(1,1,"helloworld"):" then you create a new program and recall strx remove the " " and it draw your picture.
rectangle / line / text / add page function are aviable
|
|
29 January 2004, 10:43 GMT
|
|
Windfall XP
|
Ryan Nazaretian
|
A lookalike of Windows XP. Not finished, but can distributed if wanted. All graphics and no basic looking text. Windfall XP is in BASIC format. Any questions or comments are welcomed. Windfall XP will be out soon. I may put out a demo version.
|
|
23 June 2004, 02:30 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Bad News
|
Ryan Nazaretian
|
All the work that I have done since January has been lost. First my laptop's file system crashed, but I was okay at the time, then 2 days afterward, my calculator reset itsself (I think its days are about done) because of a dead backup battery, and a lose wire inside. I am struggling to find my new files on my desktop, but I think I deleted them because I had them on my laptop. Darn technology, I wish that it was flawless. Ha, Ha, Ha, like it will ever be completly flawless (Especially with Microsoft Windows).
|
|
30 May 2005, 22:24 GMT
|
|
Antidisassemblage!!
|
shkaboinka
(Web Page)
|
I have spent over a year working on this; it is a whole new programming language for z80 TI-Calcs, and the compiler program for it. It looks like C++/Java with some interchangable BASIC-like syntax. High-Level OOP code compiles into assembly code (asm programs) for all models from TI-82 to TI-86
You can use this to do ANYTHING that can be done in assembly. Antidisassemblage is not big and easy to learn because only the fundamentals are built into it. Everything else (once finished) will be defined in "include files" (there is a special command to output asm code so you can integerate assembly into the language; most of this will be done in the background so that you don't have to worry about it).
I am looking for people who want to help test it, play with it, and when it is done (which will be soon) help write stuff for it. THIS MIGHT BE SOMETHING REVOLUTIONARY; people can make assembly programs from an easy to use High-Level OOP programming context (this is NOT ASSEMBLY, it compiles into assembly)
The language has these standard features: preprocessor commands, user defined variables of various datatypes, MULTIDIMENSIONAL arrays, functions (aka: subroutines procedures methods) that take and return values (parameters / arguments),
Global vars that can be used anywhere and local vars (temporary vars) that only have the scope of the function they are in, Static (fixed var addresses, more efficient) or dynamic (uses a stack to allow instances = RECURSION) functions, and a nice bunch of control-constructs to control program-flow
If you want to know more, or if you want to help, see my group: Antidisassemblage (the link is below my user-ID in the title bar of this post)
|
|
6 January 2005, 23:41 GMT
|
|
New compiler/language for z80 calcs (TI82 to TI86)
|
shkaboinka
(Web Page)
|
I am SO close to finishing up my compiler and everything, but before I finish it I am looking for a little help with some assembly stuff.
brief description:
when handling expressions, I'd use register-A or HL for general stuff, and then maybe B or BC during higher-order operations (order of ops), but * / and % ops require more complicated asm routines that use up lots of operators and there are different ways to do them, and I don't know which registers are the best to save info in and what the costs of "destroying" their values could be; I am not an expert at assembly. I am questioning whether I should do that, or not allow expressions but allow single operations that take one value like += *= /= etc, or just not allow * / and % (a combo of asm macros/routines can be made to do it anyways)...either way I need help. I can be more specific and detailed if you want to help.
If you can help me out (or know anyone who can), my info is in the title-bar of this post
|
|
19 March 2005, 20:31 GMT
|
|
Upcoming Program (Windows Series)
|
adam Somers
(Web Page)
|
I am going to be coming out with a windows series
This will include:
Windows 95
Windows NT Workstation 4.0
and
Windows NT Server 4.0
I will also make updates of which can be found on my web page once I get the file posted and going.
|
|
17 September 1999, 02:38 GMT
|
|
1 2 3
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|