Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Shell/kernel programs
|
36
|
19.4%
|
|
"Nostub" programs
|
99
|
53.2%
|
|
I just wanna play my games, leave me alone!
|
25
|
13.4%
|
|
What is a shell/kernel/stub?
|
26
|
14.0%
|
|
|
Re: Which do you prefer?
|
DWedit
(Web Page)
|
Oh my god is this poll TI9x centric!
On a TI83 and TI83+, nostub programs have no place. Everything runs on a shell, either SOS or ION. Or it's a flash app. Or it's Joltima, the only good nostub program for the 83+ :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
15 March 2002, 03:54 GMT
|
|
Re: Which do you prefer?
|
tge82
|
It's hard to find really good stuff that's noStub, because all the good stuff seems to be with the kernels, but after wasting a lot of time with multiple unsuccessful tries trying to get kernal-based programs to work with AMS 2.05, I'm not trying again. More noStub programs need to be made. Libraries make it easier for the programmers, but not for the users. Just like when you download a program in Windows and it won't run because it's missing a DLL file.
Note: please don't start a flame about Linux/Mac/etc. vs. Windows. Thank you. :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
16 March 2002, 05:04 GMT
|
|
Re: Which do you prefer?
|
DWedit
(Web Page)
|
Off topic:
Who the hell keeps downloading Jezzball so often that it's on top of all the top lists?!
|
Reply to this comment
|
16 March 2002, 05:39 GMT
|
|
Re: Which do you prefer?
|
Elijah McNeish
|
What's the difference? Please don't flame me, I'm stupid. I have a 92, BTW, I take it this still applies...
|
Reply to this comment
|
25 June 2002, 00:37 GMT
|
|
1 2 3
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|