Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
No, performance is not decreasing.
|
49
|
14.8%
|
|
No, other causes are to blame.
|
97
|
29.2%
|
|
Maybe, more study should be done.
|
77
|
23.2%
|
|
Yes, calculators promote blind calculations which precludes mathematical intuition and deeper understanding.
|
69
|
20.8%
|
|
Yes, burn the calculators!!!
|
18
|
5.4%
|
|
I don't know.
|
22
|
6.6%
|
|
|
Re: Do you believe that graphing calculators are causing the decrease in math knowledge and performance of university students?
|
Shaun
|
Yeah other causes, like BEER!!!!
Oh yeah first comment, when I made this comment the poll was 100% in my favor.
:)
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 March 2001, 02:25 GMT
|
|
Re: Do you believe that graphing calculators are causing the decrease in math knowledge and performance of university students?
|
Yomamaha
|
I think that having games on the calculator is to blame. When I played my calculator games in math class, I failed. I've seen it happen to my brother, myself, and others. The games are the distraction that ruins your grades.
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 March 2001, 03:11 GMT
|
|
its not the calcs
|
Luke Haywas
(Web Page)
|
It has nothing to do with the calculators, but with the ridiculous liberal mindset of too many university admissions panels who in an effort to promote "equality" and bring unnecessary "diversity" into their colleges lower their standards to allow a more "holistic" approach to evaluating applicants. The intelligent students are still out there, it's just that disproportionately many stupid people are getting into college.
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 March 2001, 03:15 GMT
|
|
Re: Math knowledge
|
Jyrinx
|
It's decreasing because America sucks at teaching math. The "drill it into your head and practice until it makes sense" method is backward and ineffective. It's no wonder that everyone hates math. The only people I know (including myself) that enjoy math liked it before schools ruined it for them. (God bless Square One TV!)
Jyrinx
jyrinx@zerg.com
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 March 2001, 05:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Math knowledge
|
David Phillips
(Web Page)
|
Different people learn in different ways. Math is no exception. Some people need to do 20 homework problems in each section to understand it. Some people don't. It depends on how your mind works. I'm a rather good computer programmer, which should be a good indication to how I think, or least an indicator that I can think a certain way.
With me, I either know it or I don't. In high school Algebra II, I could sit through an entire class period without really paying attention and not understand the material. Even writing everything down and paying attention usually didn't help. It just didn't seem to be explained the right way for me. But after class, I could ask a friend, and he could explain everything in two or three minutes that took an hour of class time for the teacher to explain.
Some parts of math are memorization. For most people, repetition is the only way to memorize something, and thus the only way to "learn" certain parts of math. An example would be derivatives of certain functions, such as trig, square root, log, etc. Yes, it is possible to derive these by hand, but doing so would make it impossible to do any more complicated problem an extremely lengthy process. The same is true for the rules that make taking derivatives easier. Technically, you don't need them, but without them it would take you at least several times longer.
There are two types of memorization: forced and natural. In my opinion, forced memorization is pointless. A person will generally forget anything he/she has been forced to memorize if it is not routinely used. In grade school, I had to memorize all of the presidents of the US, and the names of all of the states and their respective capitols. Does this mean it was a waste of time to memorize them? Probably. I can recognize a name as being a former president, or a city as being a capitol of a state, and usually even remember which one. So maybe it has some usefulness. But if I had to use this information on a day to day basis, I would memorize it just through the use of it.
It is natural to memorize anything this is frequently seen or heard. How smart a person appears is often judged by how fast or how much is memorized in this fashion. When you begin to use a friend's phone number, you usually have to look it up. After a while, you remember it without trying. Forcing yourself to memorize it would most likely be pointless. It would probably be forgotten if not used frequently.
The same holds true towards math rules. Being forced to memorize rules isn't going to help me at using them better or at remembering them. I can remember the product and quotient rules for derivatives because I use them so often. But until I used them often enough to memorize them, what harm is there in having them written down in some form?
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 March 2001, 12:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Math knowledge
|
Sethphilip
|
I SOOOOOOOO totaly agree. Like the example, I had to memorize states and capitals. It was a pain in the ass, and I dont remember crap neither. Plus one time in math class, I actually fell asleep right in the begining, slept for ALL of math class, woke up, cursed to myself, and read and understood the chapter, on my own, in 'bout one minute.
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 May 2001, 02:49 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|