Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
A
|
319
|
58.1%
|
|
B
|
159
|
29.0%
|
|
C
|
36
|
6.6%
|
|
D
|
5
|
0.9%
|
|
F :(
|
7
|
1.3%
|
|
I'm not in school anymore.
|
23
|
4.2%
|
|
|
Re: Rounded to the nearest letter grade, what\'s your cumulative grade point average?
|
alex cooke
|
let the lying begin
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 October 2000, 00:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rounded to the nearest letter grade, what\'s your cumulative grade point average?
|
joelt
|
Um, I believe your language is not appropriate for this discussion board, and I copy/paste from the comment reply form guidelines:
Don't use language you wouldn't hear on U.S. network television.
and again:
We often remove comments that stray from these guidelines.
so if your comment is deleted,
Don't post asking why a comment was deleted
Also,
Don't insult or flame other people in your comments. Keep such sentiments to private email, or better yet, avoid them completely
So, I say to you, keep off the message board, because
We will provide this forum only as long as you, our visitors, put it to worthwhile use. Thanks for your (intelligent) contributions.
and i think a lot of people like this, judging from the number of replies.
Also, this isn't meant to inflame you, but to update you on the guidelines concerning replying to a comment, so that you (hopefully) won't get our message board revoked from us.
|
Reply to this comment
|
31 October 2000, 06:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rounded to the nearest letter grade, what\'s your cumulative grade point average?
|
Daniel Bishop
(Web Page)
|
My high school had a six-point weighted scale. The registrar's way of converting to 4-point way simply to multiply everthing by 2/3.
On a traditional scale, one can get a 4.0 simply by having straight A's. However, the only way to get a 6.0 (which would convert to 4.0) on our scale was to take nothing but honors courses and get a 100 in all of them, which, not surprisingly, is something no student from my high school has ever accomplished. (The 1999 valedictorian has about 5.6 (or 3.7), and that's the highest I've ever seen.)
So, you're absolutely right about students who go to schools with 6-point GPA scales getting screwed on college applications.
But I don't care anymore. The registrar at my college was able to overlook my "3.57" HS GPA, and now I'm actually GETTING PAID to go to school.
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 October 2000, 02:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Rounded to the nearest letter grade, what\'s your cumulative grade point average?
|
Daniel Bishop
(Web Page)
|
There are two major reasons:
1) Under the traditional scale, everyone who makes straight A's gets a 4.0. In large schools, this would almost certainly cause a tie for valedictorian every year. To prevent this, it is necessary to modify the grading scale so that it is more difficult to get a perfect average. This is done by either adding +/- modifications or using a numeric scale.
But more importantly:
2) The traditional 4.0 scale does not consider the difficulty of the courses. That is, an "A" in a special ed class counts the same as an "A" in an AP class. Since this is obviously unfair to smarter students, most schools modify their grading scales so that an honors course is worth a point more than a regular course.
These concerns are less important in college, so most colleges (including the one I go to now) continue to use the A=4,B=3,C=2,D=1,F=0 scale. However, they do prevent this system from being practical for high schools.
Unfortunately, there has been little standardization of the weighted scales, which makes it virtually impossible to compare GPA's between different schools. We need a national standard, but what should it be?
|
Reply to this comment
|
1 November 2000, 05:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Rounded to the nearest letter grade, what\'s your cumulative grade point average?
|
Jared Grabill
|
Honestly, I have a 3.65. And Honestly, I could have a 4.0. And honestly, I'm a slacker. And honestly, I wish I wasn't a slacker, but school bores me. :o)
I do almost none of my homework at home, but somehow I get great test grades. This has confused mt teachers for years, and been accused of copping countless times because they can't understand me. No one can. I'd rather make calculator programs than work on Algerba II and US History., wouldn't you? :o)
|
Reply to this comment
|
1 November 2000, 04:24 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|