Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Support for a color display
|
126
|
17.9%
|
|
Compatibility between all ROM/hardware versions
|
111
|
15.7%
|
|
Large memory size
|
196
|
27.8%
|
|
High resolution
|
121
|
17.2%
|
|
Fast processor
|
151
|
21.4%
|
|
|
Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
Probyte
(Web Page)
|
I really think TI calculators should have much more memory. Especially the TI-83, it only has 28K. You can fit so little on your calculator. If there was more memory, you wouldn't have to worry so much about running out in the middle of a game.
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 March 2000, 20:29 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
CircaX
(Web Page)
|
personally, I think that more system functions should be available in BASIC and not just in ASM. Make the TI-BASIC more advanced TI!!!!
|
Reply to this comment
|
30 March 2000, 00:09 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
Jeb92
|
I would rather have the Ti-89 should have a faster processor, a screen with more pixels, a color screen, and a little antenna to receive TV signals so you can watch TV on your calc.
|
Reply to this comment
|
30 March 2000, 03:57 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
Nightbird
|
I'm torn between bigger memory and a faster CPU...i would get a combo of those cause one without the other is just a partial upgrade :) they should do a duo for it :) faster and bigger i think is better then bigger or faster :)
|
Reply to this comment
|
30 March 2000, 23:56 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
rca_dude
|
I find it weird that (practicly) all you guys want for your calculator is upgrades that would make games run better. I mean they are calculators, not game boys.
|
Reply to this comment
|
31 March 2000, 03:46 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
GForce
|
Wouldn't a power adapter be usefull... Just think, no more wasted batteries at home.
|
Reply to this comment
|
31 March 2000, 04:31 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
Mike Fuller
(Web Page)
|
Color all the way with a high resolution and a powerful CPU, but me must remember these devices were created for hard and detailed math not games.
|
Reply to this comment
|
2 April 2000, 01:43 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
skyraid
|
about the processor... on my hw2 ams2.03 ti-89, i ran the ti-bench program, and it said my processor was running at 18mhz.. i don't know if it is because it is running that fast, or it is an error in the program.. well anyway, if it's actually running that fast, i don't think that it has to be improved.. i can rememer back in the day when the fastest computers were only 27mhz~!
- skyraid
|
Reply to this comment
|
2 April 2000, 02:58 GMT
|
|
Re: Which would you rather have in a calculator?
|
skyraid
|
i voted for larger memory.. on the ti-89 with ams2.03, you have all the memory you should ever be able to use.. hey, it would be cool if ti made like a floppy disk drive.. everyone at your school would ph33r3 you when you walked into math class and hooked up a 3½ disk drive to the link port.. can even imagine the games the game you could have?!?
- skyraid
|
Reply to this comment
|
2 April 2000, 04:47 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|