Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
No, that's dangerous.
|
162
|
41.6%
|
|
No, I haven't had time.
|
132
|
33.9%
|
|
No, You can do that?
|
58
|
14.9%
|
|
Yes, my calculator is fast now.
|
24
|
6.2%
|
|
Yes, but my calculator is broken now.
|
12
|
3.1%
|
|
I don't own a graphing calculator.
|
1
|
0.3%
|
|
|
Re: Have you overclocked your TI graphing calculator?
|
Agentx002
|
I haven't yet and plan to try to some time soon. I only have two calcs so I dont want to mess up either of em, maybe I can risk screwing up my 84, but dont want to.
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 December 2009, 01:43 GMT
|
|
Re: Have you overclocked your TI graphing calculator?
|
pcflyer1
(Web Page)
|
I'm sure it's not that dangerous if done right. However, it would be dangerous if I attempted it since I wouldn't know what the hell I'm doing. I have to use my calc for Physics (since I droped Calculus II) and can't afford (or am not willing to) buy another.
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 2000, 17:16 GMT
|
|
Re: Have you overclocked your TI graphing calculator?
|
JaggedFlame
|
is overclocking dangerous just for changing the chips, or is it also dangerous that you might overwork the processor? if thats not true, then why doesn't ti just overclock their own processors and THEN market the calcs?
|
Reply to this comment
|
4 March 2000, 17:50 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|