Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Archivers reject meaningless files
|
63
|
26.4%
|
|
Rating system
|
113
|
47.3%
|
|
New folders
|
45
|
18.8%
|
|
Keep everything the same
|
5
|
2.1%
|
|
Other
|
13
|
5.4%
|
|
|
Re: What method of controlling the quality of the archives do you prefer?
|
AndySoft
(Web Page)
|
Bravo! It's about time something gets done. I think the archivers should screen the files and make the signal:noise ration larger on the signal side and smaller on the noise side. But if this would put too much of a strain on them in the long run, I would like to see the rating system instead. Granted, it's an even bigger strain for the people who code the site in the short term, but then the signal:noise would be handled by the majority of site users (or at least those who care, like myself).
Also: I cannot find the Post Comment link in the news article related to this poll. Has replying been turned off for it already?
|
Reply to this comment
|
5 March 2004, 11:49 GMT
|
|
Re: What method of controlling the quality of the archives do you prefer?
|
angelboy
(Web Page)
|
Why sould we keep the crap? I say delete it!!! It can be done by the archivers or a committee.
|
Reply to this comment
|
5 March 2004, 12:31 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|