Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Every week
|
20
|
3.6%
|
|
Every two weeks
|
45
|
8.2%
|
|
Every month
|
108
|
19.6%
|
|
Every other month
|
171
|
31.1%
|
|
Twice a year
|
106
|
19.3%
|
|
Yearly
|
35
|
6.4%
|
|
I don't remember the last time I changed my batteries.
|
65
|
11.8%
|
|
|
Re: How often do you change your batteries on your TI calculator?
|
I a
(Web Page)
|
There's a big gap between every other month (6 times/year) and twice a year (2 times/year)
|
Reply to this comment
|
21 December 1999, 06:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely legit
|
Fishexe
(Web Page)
|
People always come to me first when they have questions. Which sucks, because I don't know exactly how to use an 83+. I can figure out, but there are little differences between, say, how the memory screen works on the 83+ and the 83. And running programs on an 82, I know that most everything is the same, but there are a few syntaxes which differ between 82 and 83. Unfortunately I don't know exactly which they are.
Almost anything you ask me about an 83, I'm your man (except details of how to ASM program for it) But if I owned the others I'd be far more help. Kind of like when somebody at school asks me a windows question and I say "I don't know, I don't do windows". Now if I owned more calcs I could sure as heck be more helpful.
With multiple calcs, maybe you're using the same batteries just pulling out of one--putting in another. If you don't have any programs, this would work, or else put a massive strain on your backup battery which would have to be changed often. So it's a dumb idea, just a possibility for how more calcs could equal shorter battery life, tho' I doubt anybody would do this.
|
Reply to this comment
|
30 December 1999, 06:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Definitely legit
|
stealth
|
I own an 85, 89, and a 92+. I feel most all of Texas Instruments graphing calculators are the same. They all have a memory screen, etc. They all operate the same way in most as well. However, I can safely answer most questions for any graphing calculator from TI. For awhile, people would lend me their calculators for a day or two, so that I could take it home and put some games and programs for school on it. While I had it, I'd mess around and play with it. I think out of all the calculators, the 83 is the most difficult (I haven't messed with an 83+ yet). I don't know why I say that, I think its because I don't like the way the menus are setup, using the number pad to select options, I'm use to the F1-F5 keys for that. But anyways, about batteries. My 85 eats up batteries alot faster than my 89, I haven't had to change batteries on my 92+ yet.
|
Reply to this comment
|
30 December 1999, 14:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It might actualy be needed.
|
SmartGamer
|
There is some logic in having more than one calculator- they ALL have differing capabilities:
86- Fast graphing, built in ASM, link port, computer software, slow BASIC excecution
92- 3D graphing quickly, used to support ASM, then an "improvement" shot it down
83- Turbo basic capability, slow graphing, small screen, a glich that runs ASM (but not too terribly well)
86 is a balanced calculator except for the slow BASIC.
92 is a super grapher, and good for programming- and then TI went and broke the ASM compatibilities with this new math system
83 is somewhat disadvantaged, but for complex programs that take a while, that's the only way to finish it in an hour. Plus, it's cheap.
So, there's some logic in having extra calculators.
--S.G.
|
Reply to this comment
|
31 December 1999, 19:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
|
Matthew Hernandez
(Web Page)
|
I think you fail to see all the possibilities that a calculator offers. First off, it is used for math, and being in an advanced placement (AP) class, my calc is on the entire bell (1 hour 30 minutes). Then, because I program in BASIC, I create a ton-load of simple math program to help those wo are taking Algebra for the third time. Then, I have a graphlink and access to, well, every game made for the calc (83/83+). I offer people programs at 25 cents every upload. Seeing how there are 2000+ people in my school, there are many people wo want games so during lunch, my calc sits on the table while people come and go uploading their programs and leaving their quarter. So, thats another 45 minutes of it staying constantly on. Then, every Wednesday, I am in the "Athletes who can Teach" program and tutor people with their math. That is another 45 minutes. Then, after school for my math homework, my calc is on for another 30 minutes. I must admit that that isn't every day, more commonly every other day, but still that is a lot of time that my calc(s) stay on. Totals:
1) 1 hour 30 minutes math class
2) 45 minutes lunch hour
3) 1 hour or so spent on programming (every other day)
4) 45 minutes for afterschool tutoring
5) 30 minutes for homework
With all that considered, my calc is on quite a bit.
Before you judge, which is precisely what you did, look at the facts and what goes on. I have a "life"--termed in this popular thread.
Matt H.
|
Reply to this comment
|
25 December 1999, 23:05 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|