Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
HTTP
|
142
|
71.7%
|
|
FTP
|
32
|
16.2%
|
|
NFS
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|
SMB/CIFS
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|
RSYNC
|
3
|
1.5%
|
|
SCP (SSH)
|
15
|
7.6%
|
|
Other
|
6
|
3.0%
|
|
|
Re: Favourite download protocol?
|
pacHa
(Web Page)
|
heh http, of course
btw, i don't know the others except ftp...what are they ?
-first post-
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 September 2003, 11:29 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Favourite download protocol?
|
molybdenum
|
*sigh* windows. x86 466 mhz *another sigh* celeron, 192 megs ram, 20 gigs FAT32, 20 gigs ext3 (10 gig win, 30 gig ext3 amd fat), blah blah blah. Dual boot redhat and windows, kernel problems, gonna try compiling with SMP, Gentoo does sound really great I gotta say though, sort of a build source and make pakadge list from them / apt type? I should try it some time when I am less new.
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 September 2003, 05:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Favourite download protocol?
|
molybdenum
(Web Page)
|
I guess in FTP it is possible to swarm download, like with p2p apps, as resume is possible. If you want a good client for windows, download smartftp. Not open source, but free for non commercial use and pretty good, although there is a rarely occuring nag screen. FTP is nice for large files if they are not downloaded in browser (mozilla has a nice manager, but I use IE for speed, and I am not bothering with download accelerator spyware) but http is good for small. Of course, FTP is not too secure, as we have seen. My favorite protocol, winmx.
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 September 2003, 00:30 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|