|
Results
|
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
|
Newsletter
|
19
|
10.2%
|
|
|
Program of the Month Award (PotM)
|
84
|
44.9%
|
|
|
Both
|
75
|
40.1%
|
|
|
None
|
9
|
4.8%
|
|
|
|
Re: Which of the following features do you really, really (really) want us to bring back?
|
Rog 
|
|
You mean there isn't a newsletter? Jeez, now I feel like an idiot for signing up for it last week.
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
14 April 2003, 22:24 GMT
|
|
|
Re: Which of the following features do you really, really (really) want us to bring back?
|
acr34
(Web Page)
|
|
Too lazy to read the newspaper, but PotM was nice. Except I didn't always agree with what won it.
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
15 April 2003, 03:31 GMT
|
|
|
Bringing Back Program of the Month
|
|
Gerhalt
|
|
Now, this could take some work, but here is another suggection. Have a full page of 3-8 multiple choice questions. Have one question for each calc, with each choice being a different program. The last choice could be N/A, if you didn't have that particular calc. This would be an easy way to vote. Well, just another of my many ideas :).
Gerhalt
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
15 April 2003, 21:53 GMT
|
|
|
Re: Which of the following features do you really, really (really) want us to bring back?
|
|
pacHa
|
|
I think they should bring the POTMs back. They should split the awards like this : z80 based calcs/68k based calcs and give awards only to asm programs (or maybe to very verygood BASIC programs), i dunno...
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
16 April 2003, 19:23 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|
