Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
Subject: Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:30:46 -0800
Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
In-Reply-To: <377A443E.3C5BEA8A@home.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990630102233.2504A-100000@Sandman.ghg.net> <377A3F33.60B27D88@home.net> <377A4287.6206082@hem.passagen.se>
Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org


Remember, 7 and 7.1 were arround with win3.1 was out.  You have to admit
that it was a little more complete out of the box...


>Oh please. That's why System 7, early versions like 7 and 7.1 were
>crappy, because of lack of stability. But "crashes when you copy a file"
>is BS, and an isolated incident, Im sure. I worked with various sytem
>7's for many years, it wasn't awful, it just crashed to much. It still
>looked(and was) a hell of a lot nicer than Windows. But I'm not even
>going to bother arguing about outdated OSes.
>
>-P
>
>>>An OS that locks up your entire system when you copy a file, or
>chrashes
>everything when one app goes down sucks, no matter who made it.

References:

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: Sandman <sandmanx@ghg.net>

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: Paul Kafasis <Punkrock17@home.net>

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

From: Paul Kafasis <Punkrock17@home.net>