Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw

• To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• Subject: Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• From: Paul Kafasis <Punkrock17@home.net>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 12:22:26 -0400
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware-outgoing@towerguard.unix.edu.sollentuna.se
• Delivered-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org
• References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.990630102233.2504A-100000@Sandman.ghg.net> <377A3F33.60B27D88@home.net> <377A4287.6206082@hem.passagen.se>
• Reply-To: ti-hardware@lists.ticalc.org

Oh please. That's why System 7, early versions like 7 and 7.1 were
crappy, because of lack of stability. But "crashes when you copy a file"
is BS, and an isolated incident, Im sure. I worked with various sytem
7's for many years, it wasn't awful, it just crashed to much. It still
looked(and was) a hell of a lot nicer than Windows. But I'm not even
going to bother arguing about outdated OSes.

-P

>>An OS that locks up your entire system when you copy a file, or
chrashes
everything when one app goes down sucks, no matter who made it.

• Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>
• Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• From: Grant Stockly <gussie@stockly.com>

• Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• From: Sandman <sandmanx@ghg.net>
• Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• From: Paul Kafasis <Punkrock17@home.net>
• Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• From: Olle Hedman <oh@hem.passagen.se>

• Prev: Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• Next: Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread