Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: TI-H: OT: The Ad I saw
You obviosly need some training in reading english.
I never said it crashed when I copied, I said it locked up the system, that is,
did not allow me to do anything until it was done copying. in other word,
multitask = no.
os 7 _was_ awful. the only macs I have used that was even close to be useful is
the new G3 ones... the old PPC lacked in bad OS and slow graphiccards..
But I guess I havn't used many powerfull macs, just "normal" ones..
I think macOS is an insult for the processors they use, and the choice of
graphics and other such stuff on "normal" macs (= for home use) is plain stupid.
Just as stupid as IBM aptivas and early Compaqs.
stupid saveings, wich made it slow, and with a price that still was to high.
I hope they have learnt something now, wich I think shows that they have..
but they managed to make the imacs increadbily uggly :) and thay have the most
unergonomic mouse I have ever tried.
//Olle
And about no diskdrive on iMac.. Who the hell uses disketts nowadays :) I for
shure doesnt. they just brake. no.. network is the thing.
Paul Kafasis wrote:
>
> Oh please. That's why System 7, early versions like 7 and 7.1 were
> crappy, because of lack of stability. But "crashes when you copy a file"
> is BS, and an isolated incident, Im sure. I worked with various sytem
> 7's for many years, it wasn't awful, it just crashed to much. It still
> looked(and was) a hell of a lot nicer than Windows. But I'm not even
> going to bother arguing about outdated OSes.
>
> -P
>
> >>An OS that locks up your entire system when you copy a file, or
> chrashes
> everything when one app goes down sucks, no matter who made it.
Follow-Ups:
References: