Re: A86: Strategy Games
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Strategy Games
>Well, if you are actually going to do this, although, as I have read, I
>wouldn't suggest it, I would suggest(?) you doing a C&C Sole Survivor type
>game. It only requires 1 unit per player, and maps can be quite small. Sure
>the playability will be shot, but the mem and system requirements may just
>be able to work on non-accelerated calcs.
Another nifty idea, but that is aimed more at RTS-style...
As Nicholas Clark pointed out, so many people have an RTS mindset
these days, they probably aren't willing to sit down and have a go at
writing a turn-based engine. For the calc, a turn-based engine is far
superior than an attempt at real-time in this senario.
...Still, a sole survivor-style game wouldn't be half bad in a link
game... only problem is the fact that real-time links seems to
breakdown easily (As seen by bomberbloke), although it might be worth
a shot after I finish with this. :)
-Krev
--
----
"Science describes how our universe reacts in a mathematical
representation of it, but can be described in regular terms. These
terms seem to infringe on Religion's role of describing the creation,
and once Science finds a clue to the creation, Religion declares
Science a heretic. Religion scolds Science, telling it to stick to
doing what it does best. To this, Science laughs and complies, going
after the creation once again. Wouldn't it be fair to listen to the
fact that these humans could have been a product of the Creator just
as we are, Borak?" - Cyander, Day for the Xenith: Xenith Dawn
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
References: