Re: A86: Strategy Games
[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: A86: Strategy Games
Well, if you are actually going to do this, although, as I have read, I
wouldn't suggest it, I would suggest(?) you doing a C&C Sole Survivor type
game. It only requires 1 unit per player, and maps can be quite small. Sure
the playability will be shot, but the mem and system requirements may just
be able to work on non-accelerated calcs.
Nicholas Clark wrote:
> Well, the reason why, IMHO, there are so few strategy games for TI's is
> because so many people fall into the "Warcraft" mindset, which a
> calculator just cannot handle. Also, although I don't know for certain,
> I would imagine that writing an AI would prove a challenge as well. A
> turn-based, like Heroes of Might and Magic, however, would work very
> well I think on the '86. (My rational behind this being that is was
> ported to the Game-boy, which isn't all that different from the '86)
>
> Adam Thayer wrote:
> >
> > Tis' me again, with another question, this time to get input on
> > another project I have been working on, which is the Turn-Based
> > strategy game.
> >
> > I was wondering why something like this has only ever been done once,
> > and even then only in BASIC (huge, but decent). Sure someone has
> > tried making C&C for the 86, and was gonna end up with a freakin'
> > huge program, with large maps so he dropped the project... go figure.
> >
> > I believe that I have found a way to make an expandable map-driven
> > turn-based version which will be an odd hybrid of C&C/Total
> > Annihilation/RoboSport techniques to produce an insanely small
> > program with a true behavioral-based AI.
> > Maps themselves will take less than 1000 bytes apiece (30x30
> > squares), which is the current maximum, but if it turns out I have
> > room to spare in RAM page 1, I can expand this limit. Savegames will
> > be fairly large (depending on the units/sides, up to 4 sides, around
> > 128 units apiece) at around 1500 bytes on a heavy game. The data for
> > the tilesets will be around 1k-2k (4 different map types, possibly
> > more if I implement a proper tileset loader) with around 32-48
> > different tiles for each set. Plus I currently have 7 mobile units
> > and 6 buildings (including ones that can attack) with more coming.
> > With this oddly compact data, there is a drawback: no greyscale. I
> > have decided to keep greyscale OUT until I have a chance to
> > finish/test the skirmish and link-play, and the tiles are all 8x8
> > square...
> >
> > Well, my main question is asking why there is a lack of strategy
> > warfare games out there, although input on the project itself is
> > appreciated.
> >
> > -Krev
> > --
> > ----
> > "Science describes how our universe reacts in a mathematical
> > representation of it, but can be described in regular terms. These
> > terms seem to infringe on Religion's role of describing the creation,
> > and once Science finds a clue to the creation, Religion declares
> > Science a heretic. Religion scolds Science, telling it to stick to
> > doing what it does best. To this, Science laughs and complies, going
> > after the creation once again. Wouldn't it be fair to listen to the
> > fact that these humans could have been a product of the Creator just
> > as we are, Borak?" - Cyander, Day for the Xenith: Xenith Dawn
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> --
> -Nick
> Fear is the path to the spoon side of the spork.
Follow-Ups:
References: