ticalc.org
Basics Archives Community Services Programming
Hardware Help About Search Your Account
   Home :: Archives :: News :: New Wireless Link Developed

New Wireless Link Developed
Posted by Michael on 12 July 2003, 19:22 GMT

Cerrato Renaud has developed wireless linking hardware for TI calculators. This design uses a 433 MHz radio transmitter with a microcontroller, so it works without any special drivers. The range is stated as up to 50 meters. The demonstration software is for the TI-92, but it's easy to write programs for the other calculators as well.

 


The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.


Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Tacvek  Account Info

If i converted the price right each nit costs under $33 US, however that might not be true, because the prices of the components may be different. Also use of the product might not be legal in the united states, due to fcc regulations. however it is a really neat concept.

     12 July 2003, 22:39 GMT

Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Tacvek  Account Info

'nit' should have been 'unit'.

     12 July 2003, 22:41 GMT

Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
renaud cerrato  Account Info
(Web Page)

Hi !

Component's price are very high in France, so the cost is probably under 30$ for many countries.

About FCC regulations : 433.92Mhz is a free frequency, legally you can broadcast only 6 minutes/hours (10% of time). Output power is about 10dbm (10mW).

     13 July 2003, 01:14 GMT


Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

Maybe I'm just not quick enough to understand it, but how could this illegal? Why would the FCC care what we are doing with our calcs? Would it have something to do with linking interferences or something?

     13 July 2003, 17:47 GMT


Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Cullen Logan  Account Info
(Web Page)

The Federal Communications Commission has complete control over all frequency bands in the U.S. It is there job to enforce that certain bands are restricted to use by government, intelligence, commerce, etc. For this reason they must set limits on the amount of power that can be used for transmission as well as what frequencies can be used and by whom. Luckily the frequency band chosen for this application is a free band meaning that anyone can use it so long as the power of the transmitted signal does not exceed a set limit. The same organization (FCC) is the reason that you must turn off your cell phone when flying in an airplane. I'm sure that you have heard of WiFi or 802.11a,b,g. These all use free frequency bands which is what makes wireless networking so great, although troublesome at times.

     13 July 2003, 18:08 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Joe B  Account Info

wireless networking is great... in fact, i'm using it right now to browse the internet and to try to find a pic876.. which i can't seem to find

     13 July 2003, 19:42 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Cullen Logan  Account Info
(Web Page)

Try the link above. That should allow you to order direct from Microchip. You may be able to get a better price at digikey or elswhere though.

     13 July 2003, 21:00 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Joe B  Account Info

i still can't find it anywhere..

     14 July 2003, 01:44 GMT

Well, the FCC won't let me be. Let me be me or let me see... they try to shut me down on MTV, but it feels so empty without me
no_one_2000_  Account Info
(Web Page)

I've often wondered why you're supposed to turn off cell phones on an airplane. I think they also prohibited the use of any electronic devices during take-off, but it's been a while since I was on a plane.

Well, it's good that this thing is legal... if it wasn't, then that could be bad. :)

     14 July 2003, 18:30 GMT


RE: Well, the FCC won't let me be. Let me be me or let me see... they try to shut me down on MTV, but it feels so empty wit
Tacvek  Account Info

Electronics durring takeoff is for saftey.

The real reason they dissallow Cell phones is that when you are that high up and moving that quickly you would be switching towers vey often, this could thoeryeticly cause a free call, but could also increase the price of the call, The calls could disconnect suddenly etc. (This was from a reliable news article in one of the magazines I read.)

I am not certain that it is an FCC regulation, but i'm fairly sure that it is not an FAA regulation.

     17 July 2003, 01:44 GMT


...
Frank A. Nothaft  Account Info
(Web Page)

No. It can cause signal interfeirence with the navigation controller last time I checked.

     20 July 2003, 17:09 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Frank A. Nothaft  Account Info
(Web Page)

Uhm... 802.11b and g run on one of the most crowded frequences of all, 2.4 GHz...

So, we're either using different definitions of 'free' or...

     14 July 2003, 21:30 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Frank A. Nothaft  Account Info
(Web Page)

Clarification: Are you saying free as in available for use or as in not taken?

     15 July 2003, 02:26 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
gamedwellerz  Account Info
(Web Page)

Free frequency means that the FCC does not reserve it for a special use like a radio station or some government thing. You dont need a special license do brodcast on it too. But you are limited on the amount of power you can use.

     15 July 2003, 17:38 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Frank A. Nothaft  Account Info
(Web Page)

Ok. I was just checking 2 see how you were defining it.

     17 July 2003, 00:42 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
John Gilbertson  Account Info

There is also the potential of interference to the amateur service since 433 MHz lies in the 70cm amateur band.

     14 July 2003, 22:13 GMT

Re: New Wireless Link Developed
chemoautotroph Account Info

It runs on radio signals, does that mean one could broadcast a program over an AM radio station to be recieved by people with 2.5 mm -> 3.5 mm stereo cable adapters?

     13 July 2003, 01:36 GMT


Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Merthsoft
(Web Page)

Why would you need an adapter?

     13 July 2003, 03:16 GMT


Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
Brett W.  Account Info

The person above is talking about being able to broadcast a signal ove an AM frequency and then others could tune to that station and then they could plug an adapter(you need one because the headphone jacks on stereos are too big for a ti link cable) into the headphone jack and be able to receive information that way which I think would be pretty awesome!

     13 July 2003, 04:50 GMT

No way
renaud cerrato  Account Info
(Web Page)

Hi!

It's not possible to broadcast over AM Radio, transmitter is integrated into Aurel's module, so you can't demodulate signal with radio.

     13 July 2003, 15:58 GMT

Re: No way
chemoautotroph Account Info

drat!

     13 July 2003, 16:10 GMT

Re: No way
Cullen Logan  Account Info
(Web Page)

How much bandwidth is it per user on your device? Or do all users share the same band gap? Also would you consider implementing some kind of a CDMA or TDMA to get the number of users to increase?

     13 July 2003, 18:10 GMT


Bandwith
renaud cerrato  Account Info
(Web Page)

For the moment, this is the version 1.0, only 2 calcs can chat' together, this an half-duplex communications. Therefore, you can try to connect 3 or more TIs : all datas sent by one, will be sent to all TIs (not recommended).
Acutally i'm searching to implement network, but i don't have so much idea about how to do this. Is someone can help me ?

Sincerely

     13 July 2003, 19:22 GMT


Re: Bandwith
Cullen Logan  Account Info
(Web Page)

It seems that if we wanted to do a MIMO (multiple input multiple output) we would need a DSP. The overhead would be pretty high and it would definately be huge project. Basically cell phones are just now (since 1990's) using CDMA. Every user is given an orhtogonal code that his signal is multiplied by. In this manner all users share the same frequency band...massive interference. However through using the orthogonal codes the signel that is received by the "server" can use another algorithm to seperate the signal into the individual signals from all users. It is pretty complex and may require an ARM processor, but I'm sure there are other less advanced techniques that could be explored.

     13 July 2003, 21:06 GMT


Re: Re: Bandwith
renaud cerrato  Account Info
(Web Page)

Very interesting topics. But i plan on Ethernet-like protocol or simply a master/slave protocol to share connection.

If someone has some idea about it...

     13 July 2003, 22:06 GMT

Re: Re: Re: Bandwith
RCTParRoThEaD_ Account Info
(Web Page)

talk to kerm martian, he's the expert of calc networking

     15 July 2003, 05:45 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Bandwith
ac  Account Info

No,don't ask Kerm. He's the expert of projects that don't get finished.

     16 July 2003, 01:02 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bandwith
Chivo  Account Info

I think experts of unfinished projects are usually the very knowledgable ones. I think asking kerm martian is probably a good idea, since he's an expert on calc networking (I don't know that for myself...just referring to RCTParRroThEaD_ above).

     18 July 2003, 21:48 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bandwith
ac  Account Info
(Web Page)

See link for all the stuff Kermie Hasn't finished.

     19 July 2003, 03:07 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Bandwith
Frank A. Nothaft  Account Info
(Web Page)

It woln't work properly... and thats if it even works @ all...

     17 July 2003, 17:32 GMT


Re: No way
Michael O'Brien  Account Info
(Web Page)

I'm not sure if this store is nation (US) wide, but a place now called Mar Vac Electronics sells electronics kits. One of them allows transmistion to either the AM band or FM band. Just allow for the imput to be from the calculator instead of a microphone and then people can use the radio to link. Only problem that arises is the static being converted into "data".

     16 July 2003, 19:35 GMT


Re: Re: No way
Tacvek  Account Info

Not quite true, from what i can tell the reciving calculator must be able to contact the sending calculator, stating that it recived the transmition.

     17 July 2003, 01:49 GMT

Re: Re: Re: No way
Michael O'Brien  Account Info
(Web Page)

I forgot that the circuit was one way, thanks.

     17 July 2003, 18:10 GMT


Re: Re: Re: No way
Michael O'Brien  Account Info
(Web Page)

Yes, that is if you use TI's protocal. But if you just have a low-level recieve set up you could skip that. My other comment was suppoesed to read "I forgot that the kit was just a transmitter"

     17 July 2003, 23:07 GMT


Re: Re: Re: Re: New Wireless Link Developed
chemoautotroph Account Info

Thanks for the explaination... that's exactly what I meant.

     13 July 2003, 16:10 GMT

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.

  Copyright © 1996-2012, the ticalc.org project. All rights reserved. | Contact Us | Disclaimer