Dude! How k-reet of Chicago's number one FUN! member. The best part is the inclusion of an "a" in the word Number in the title. The program looks better than ass in cake and I shall download it immediately. Thanks Nick!

Love,
Stuart Bergstrom

TEAM FUN! OWNS YOU

http://fun.pitas.com

--BlueCalx

/me wonders if this news item qualifies "Wacky Fun Random Numbar Generator v1.00000069" to be a Featured Program and up for a POTM choice...

That'd be funny if it beat out all other 86 and 89 programs for the month.

I wouldn't be surprised if it did.

It probably will if it qualifies because vaporware is incredibly popular these days, whether its supposed to be hardware or software.

V4P0RW4RE RUL3Z!!!

0f c0ur53 |7 d035!
:)

Hey, Richard Feynman is dead. There is no way he could have made this comment unless, of course, this program can be used to bring people back from the dead!!! Amazing!!!

I am not Richard Feynman. I am an anonymous, well, almost anonymous, amateur programmer for TI calculators, specifically the 83, 85, 86, and 89. I have no idea who this Richard Feynman guy is/was, but I am not him.

I don't know who that is either.

Richard P. Feynman was a physicist who worked a lot with quantum mechanics and also wrote the book _Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!_ This book should be required reading for everyone, because it's great! It disproves the misconception that people have that scientists must be boring people. Seriously, you _need_ this hilarious book. Get it from your local library today (or tomorrow, if your local library happens to be closed today).

Doh! I should have known that, as much as I've read about quantum mechanics and other theoretical physics. By the way, the Tau Neutrino is now proven to exist, joining its bretheren the Electron Neutrino and Muon Neutrino in proven physics. There was an article about it on /. last thursday.

Random Numbar Generator is better than any neutrino !!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, but with a few tweaks, it could be made into a random neutrino generator!

But then they wouldn't be just neutrinos, they would be a collection of random neutrinos!

Actually, they would just be neutrinos, because they are next to impossible to detect and even harder to contain.

I'm sure RANDOM NUMBAR GENERATOR can detect and contain them.

I have extensively tested for this result, and the only way to contain neutrinos is within a black hole. But then they are useless, because not even the immense power of the Random Numbar Generator can compensate for the distortions of space and time inside the event horizon. Within the event horizon, all paths out lead back in. That black hole might have explained why my alarm clock didn't go off this morning....

"Re:"'s are supercalifragilisticexpialidociously fun! There's so many!

Pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcano-
conioticallity contributed to the previous post and this one. I was choking on dust. And I discovered the maximum limit for words in this post when that first word was not dashed. I added in the dash by coughing up some dust.

I am slowly expanding this page onward and rightward.

Sorry; I misspelled pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcano- conioticality. And I have to compress the subject line or the computer gets mad at me.

Yes, V4P0RW4RE, I am the biggest fan of V4P0RW4RE

In Fact I make V4P0RW4RE more often then there are seconds in a day...WOW V4P0RW4RE RUL3Z!!!

Unless you can type at like 50 words a second, its all neuroware (vaporware still in the designer's head only).

Some people's heads are vapor.

Ah, yes, the induhviduals of the world.

There are a lot of those.

It appears that some people _have_ read either "The Dilbert Principle" or "The Dilbert Future." I figured this would have the largest concentration of such people other than, of course, www.dilbert.com

As you may recall (qouted from the introduction of "The Dilbert Future"):
There are two types of people in the world: the bright and attractive people like yourself who read Dilbert books, and the 6 billion idiots who get in our way. Since we're outnumbered, it's a good idea not to refer to them as idiots to their faces. A devious Dilbert reader suggested calling them "In-duh-viduals" instead. The advantage to this word is that you can insult someone without risk of physical harm."

That explains why there are too many induhviduals in the world. I hope that I have not just ignited a flame war larger than any found on the Anarchy Trial. (asbestos at the ready)

Well as long as you have a whole lot of asbestos it really doesn't matter.

Yes, but it would take the shock wave from a 50 megaton nuke to put out all the flames from 6 billion angry induhviduals.

Only 50 megatons? That's net very much ...

True, but the shockwave from bombs of less than a megaton travel at the speed of sound (constant regardless of power) and create immense vacuums behind them (strength varies directly with power). Nothing can burn in a vacuum.

Things may not be able to burn in a vacuum, but their existence can still be nullified by RANDOM NUMBAR GENERATOR in a vacuum (after all, RANDOM NUMBAR GENERATOR exists throught the universe, even in a so-called "vacuum").

Just don't get me started on negative energy, dark matter, and other theoretical physics quirks.

WELL, i heard from my covert MIT contact that Nick's numbar generator was instrumental in calculating the process necessary to store both antimatter AND photons at room temperature in the space of 3 nickels. Anyways, my -81 likely NEVER would've came out of that quantum singularity without having randnumgen pre-installed.

...Bah! 440 comments and counting

Why? Species 8472 wouldn't release it from fluidic space?

60 megatons is the most powerful ever detonated (Soviet test in Siberia in 1953). Any blast/impact of power greater than 100 megatons would do enough damage that it would cause another catastrophic extension such as the one that killed the dinosaurs, among other plant and animal species, 65 million years ago, and the mass extinction 245 million years ago that killed off over 50 percent of all species at that time.

Wow, you certainly are quite productive. It's a shame that most other people can't keep up with such a development rate.

If I only developed v4p0rw4r3, er, n3ur0w4r3, I could be at least as productive as him.