Nice April Fool.

But at least, just put a tiny tiny link to the real site...

You need to look more carefully, because links exist...

Thanks, I've spotted it :)

Me too. ☺

Something happened to my smile. That is what the numbers and other things are. :P

Funny April Fool's joke... I eventually figured it out, after clicking the links. I do have to say, that graish bar at the top looks shiny. ^_^ Nice work.

That fake webpage seriously confused me. I really thought that ticalc.org hadn't paid their dues...

Oh well, I'm gullible!

I was searching around and I got the briliant idea to check the scource. I wasn't fooled even though this was the first time this year I've been on TI-calc.org. I was just aware of the date.

ps: the icon for the page gave it away too

Heheheh... [sarcasm]I wasn't fooled at all by the fake webpage...[/sarcasm]

I also liked http://www.detachedsolutions.com/'s April Fool's Day joke. Oh, and have you seen the new Google Romance? ;)

it doesn't allow html.

Nice newsletter (which I originally thought was going to be an April Fool's joke on top of anoh April Fool's joke to catch me off guard).

I like the suggestions for programs to be made this year (let's see how many of them actually show up). Some good laughs in the humor section. Looking foreward to the next newsletter (when it does come out(.

My first reaction was that ticalc.org finally decided to change the look of their site (before I took a closer look at the fake page). :-)

Ironically, I was just about to come to ticalc.org to see what their April Fools joke was this time. But in the several minutes it took me to do it (I was doing several other things at the same time, so it took a while), I sort of forgot the reason I was coming in the first place. So I was close to being fooled this time, but I knew what was happening after a couple of seconds.

Same here.

By the way, the fake index page is cool. I definitely recognize the "popular searches". ;-)

>>So in short:: TI-projects may help you get a job!

It certainly helped me. When I interviewed for my job, I met with 6 people over 4 hours (5 engineers and 1 HR) and I spent a 1/2 of it talking about various assembly languages (68k, atmel, 6800, z80, sparc).

>>If the CPU core is generated by a separate program, the duplicate code only needs to be created and maintained once by hand.

You could use macros.

Yeah, macros work too, but I like being able to see the actual m68k instructions for each opcode, instead of a list of macros. It makes it easier for me to spot optimisations and bugs. Many CPU cores are built from macros though, and it's probly less initial work...so whatever =)

did anyone else notice the spelling error of Texzas and Tezxas?

Yup, thanks for pointing it out. It will be reflected in the archive on the website.

for those of you who found it too hard to find ticalc's homepage, you'll never make it here

http://3564020356.org/index.html

That first one was ridiculously easy.