Well, there is absolutely nothing stopping me from getting an 89 now. I am going to get one probablly tuesday.

-W-

Somebody should make GTA-at least GTA 1 for the 68k series! Please reply if you are willing to do this.

Check the link. It's been thought of.

(cough) On a huge list of future projects?

(sniffle) ah man... must be contagous... Better than nothing.

Are there any GTA 68k screen shots! I would love to see what it looks like.

FUTURE projects means that there aren't any!

Dude, that man has more "future projects" than Microsoft! Seriously, I can't really be hopeful about a game that's on a list that's just about the entire list of Game Boy games...guy should just make a GB emulator...*sigh*

If I knew how, I would make a GTA game...I've always wanted one.

I would too...

The majority will get made. It's just a matter of interest. The more popular one are more likely to be made first.

BE INTERESTED!!!

I'm not saying it won't be made (although that is honestly a distinct possibility), partially because I don't know the guy. As for me, I've had lists like that for a long time, and have yet to do any of it...so I cannot personally hold out high hopes.

In other words, I mean nothing personal, and nothing against the guy himself; but from personal experience, such lists tend to remain just lists.

As far as a GB emu, as a true emu, there would be space problems (roms are 256kb, so maybe one game at a time, oh, and roms are easy to find and should only be downloaded if you own the original, but it's your call.) btw, roms wopuld have to be modified in some way, i'm sure to be used on a calc. Otherwise, the games would have to be made by a programmer. Even so, it would be nice to see it.

What is GTA?

It stands for Grand Theft Auto. See link. It's for the latest (already released) version. It's the opposite of True Crime.

Or Driv3r (Driver 3). You're a cop in that one too.

I just tried out PreOS on my 89Ti and think I'm in love.

Iceberg + Ghostbuster + HW3 patch worked fine on my 89Ti, with maybe four or five exceptions, but since I like nostub programs better, I mostly just go with the HW3 patch, and none of the kernels, whether it be TitaniK, Iceberg, or PreOS.

Hmm, I had Doors a long time ago on my TI (HW1)...will this support all kernel-based games (read: all those old ones that say "doorsos-only" and such)?

I'm a bit wary on putting a kernel on...anything I should consider first?

Hmm, I sound like a newbie here, I'm really not; just inexperienced when it comes to kernels (well, on the TI anyhow).

Doors has been outdated for years, and should have problems running on the last AMS releases. Doorsos II is a kernel v3, and won't run programs for kernel v4 and v5.
PreOs can run programs from v3 to v5 on all AMS version and v2 on AMS 1.01 (see the readme in the pack).

Doors Explorer (aka "doors") works fine on Titanium.
Whereas Doors OS (aka "doorsos") doesn't work at all on Ittanium.

>>Doors Explorer (aka "doors") works fine on Titanium.

It is probably possible to find twin symbol bugs with an old shell that allows basic program execution.

Could you explain?