M.C.Mik v1.1u released
Posted on 2 February 1999, 05:08 GMT
Andreas Ess of Icarus Productions has released M.C.Mik v1.1u (Usgard) for the TI-85. This side-scrolling game features 4-level grayscale graphics, five levels, and many different enemies, bosses, and weapons. Although smaller than the original ZShell version, it still takes up about 19K of your memory. Andreas Ess has also released the source code for Plain Jump II v0.9 Beta (ZShell) for the TI-85. He is looking for someone to port the game to Usgard.
|
|
|
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors. Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
|
|
Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
Eugene
|
WOW, it looks great.
|
|
2 February 1999, 05:20 GMT
|
|
Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
Nathan Haines
(Web Page)
|
Hey, this is great! I loved this game when it first came out! And to think that Andi never /once/ told me he was working on it! :)
|
|
2 February 1999, 05:25 GMT
|
|
Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
max
|
I'm quite sure that there will be at least one person asking: "pOrT it tO ThE TI xx" :-(
I don't own a 85 but i'm happy to see that programmers don't forget this old-timer! Good work Andreas!...
|
|
2 February 1999, 07:18 GMT
|
|
Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
yurik
|
What the hell are you guys talking about? Ti-85 is still a very good calc. At least its better than 83,82,81 and the stupid 80. And dont you be calling my friend Andreas names here you moron.
|
|
2 February 1999, 21:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
Super Llama
|
Reasons why you are wrong (aka Why the 85 is better):
1. USGARD can run ZSHELL games, maybe not all, but most of them
2. More shells = better features because of competition
3. Mine rarely ever crashes, and if it does I know about 15-20 people who I could get games from
4. ASM started here, if it wasnt for the 85 you wouldnt have "Built In ASM" on your 83
5. As for your finance functions: I am almost sure in about 10-20 min I could make or find a quick dumb BASIC program for everyone of them.
6. The 83 is easier to play games on? CUSTOM-F1 isnt rocket science either, is it?
7. You can write text to the graph on the 85, just not with BASIC
8. How is it easier to program, is it the hard to manuever menus, or the lack of lowercase letters?
9. Also as for the stats see number 5
10. Almost all of the functions of an 82/83 on the 85, so unless you are illiterate and an idiot, its pretty easy to "translate" where to find them on your 85
11. I have higher math capabilities on mine, just look at your crappy solver.
12. Really nowadays, the ROM version doesnt really matter, most everything runs on every calc.
13. As for the "cosmetic" issue, who really gives a crap.
I have an 82, 83, 85, 86, and a 92, plus I will soon have an 89. I dont hate 83's, dont get me wrong, but the 85 and the 86 are much better calcs, as is the 92, but i dont feel like "lugging" it around
|
|
6 February 1999, 06:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
Eugene
|
Hmm... let's see... how can the 85 be better than the 83?
1. no comment
2. so?
3. so? So can the 85. Just get the inverse equation. :P
4. that's a pile of BS. It's not like anyone programs asm using the built-in program editor. (Anyone want to dispute? go ahead)
5. yeah, but you can't type in the commands; you have to select them from a plethora of menus. And what if you can't find the command? On the 85, you can just type in the commands, case- insensitive.
6. Oh, please, do you actually use them?
7. True.
8. That depends, actually. The thing is, if you get a new TI-85, you will have no problems with compatibility for asm programs. There is only one ROM version that has been on the market for the past year: 10.0. Whereas on the 83, version 1.08000 was released in the middle of last year. So guess what? We have lots of 1.07000's out there. There could be some compatibility problems there.
9. Your point being?
10. Okay, it's prettier, but it still is ugly. Those colors are nauseating.
11. True, but what do you do when graphing sequences? The TI-83 is different from the 82 in this respect.
12. How so?
13. uh, what the--?
14. I won't argue.
Okay, so the 83 is better than the 85. But still??? There are better calculators out there. (Like the coming soon to a store near you TI-83+, which will make all your 83's obsolete; after all, it is possible to create programs for the 83+ that can't be run on the 83. Hint, hint, archive swapping.)
|
|
6 February 1999, 07:13 GMT
|
|
Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
Daren Ho
(Web Page)
|
Hm... for some reason, there isn't any screenshots when you click on the symbol right next to the file name, and ironically, it shows a screenshot on the news.
|
|
2 February 1999, 22:16 GMT
|
|
Re: M.C.Mik v1.1u released
|
Val
(Web Page)
|
Ya, ya just woundering does this game work with the 86? if so with what shell?
and if not will it be ported to the 86, or other ti-xx calcs?
|
|
2 February 1999, 22:42 GMT
|
|
1 2 3
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|