| 
| 
| 
3D Game in DevelopmentPosted on 10 September 1998, 03:51 GMT
  Adamman is developing a 3D game for the TI-82 called "3D Game" and is looking for a good name for it.  The game will feature:   Adamman has no plans for porting it to other calculators, however if someone wants to port it after the TI-82 version is released, send him an e-mail.  A small demo should be released soon.  For more information check out the 3D Game Home Page.Grayscale graphics Non-orthogonal walls (not at 90 degrees of each other) "Constant-Z" texture mapping  |  |  
|  |  
 
 
| 
| 
The comments below are written by ticalc.org visitors.  Their views are not necessarily those of ticalc.org, and ticalc.org takes no responsibility for their content.
 |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| AdamMan (Web Page)
 |  
| 
You all suck
 |  
|  | 22 April 1999, 20:14 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| joekool84 |  
| 
where can i pick up this game?
 jonathan
 |  
|  | 23 September 1999, 03:53 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| Jbrett (Web Page)
 |  
| 
Are there going to be guns and enemies???
 |  
|  | 10 September 1998, 04:50 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| Daren Ho (Web Page)
 |  
| 
I wonder if they're making an engine for it.
P.S. my website has nothing to do about TI calcs
 |  
|  | 10 September 1998, 05:06 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| Jake B (Web Page)
 |  
| 
Why for the 82?
 |  
|  | 10 September 1998, 06:02 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| S.T.L. (Web Page)
 |  
| 
Um... Foxenstein. *chuckle*
 |  
|  | 10 September 1998, 06:19 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| Erik |  
| 
What kind of greyscale routines did you have in mind? The ones I've seen have all been seriously slow, but if u have some speedy code, couldn't you share it with the rest of the ti82-comunity?
 |  
|  | 10 September 1998, 13:01 GMT |  |  
| 
 
| Re: 3D Game in Development |  
| Leon Pierre (Web Page)
 |  
| 
I cant wait for an 86 version, I am sure it will be 10 times better than the 82 version!
 |  
|  | 11 September 1998, 00:50 GMT |  |  
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  
  | 
 
| Re: Re: Better optimized? |  
| XaVIëR (Web Page)
 |  
| 
OK Children, stop fighting. *LOL*
I am a faithful 82 user, and I have found a renowned interest in my 85 (which i still dislike the interface of) and I think that the 82 is better.
 More power to Adamman!
 I don't use assembly much, and most of my programming comes in BASIC, but I'll be the first to tell you that the 82 is just as widely used as the 85/86 and demands just as many kickass games as the blackbacks (85's and 86's).
 I hope that we all can grow up a bit, and stop flaming each other.
 When my graphlink arrives, I shall try out your 3d game, adamman, and, what would be really cool is something like Quake. :) Especially with deathmatch ability.
 
 Please, guys and gals, stop dissing each other's calcs and focus on the topic at hand: This 3d game will kick major butt, and who knows- maybe someone else WILL port it to teh 85. :)
 
 XaVIëR
 |  
|  | 18 September 1998, 17:28 GMT |  |  1  2  3
 
 You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
 
 
 |