|
Results
|
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
|
Yes, a TI-Nspire/Nspire CX
|
3
|
5.2%
|
|
|
Yes, a TI-83+/84+
|
3
|
5.2%
|
|
|
Yes, a TI-89/89 Titanium/Voyage 200
|
3
|
5.2%
|
|
|
Yes, some other TI calculator
|
2
|
3.4%
|
|
|
Yes, a non-TI calculator
|
0
|
0.0%
|
|
|
No, but I wanted one
|
8
|
13.8%
|
|
|
No, but that's okay
|
31
|
53.4%
|
|
|
I didn't celerbrate Christmas
|
3
|
5.2%
|
|
|
I *gave* a calculator as a gift to my crush and then got dumped for it
|
5
|
8.6%
|
|
|
|
Re: Did you get a calculator this Christmas?
|
calcvids 
(Web Page)
|
|
I wanted a TI-82 to fill in my programming-skills gap.
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
2 January 2012, 04:34 GMT
|
|
|
Re: Did you get a calculator this Christmas?
|
Caleb Hansberry
(Web Page)
|
|
"Did you get a calculator for Christmas?" is like, totally far from "Is the Casio Prizm uglier than the TI-Nspire CX?". If I were not on Cemetech, I would say that they both looked nice, but that Kerm Martian was somewhat biased against the look of the n-spire due to the lack of ASM programmability. But as I am on Cemetech, I will not. :)
|
|
Reply to this comment
|
12 January 2012, 04:00 GMT
|
|
1 2
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|
