Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
30Xa
|
2
|
1.8%
|
|
73
|
3
|
2.6%
|
|
80/81/82
|
2
|
1.8%
|
|
83/83+/83+SE
|
9
|
7.9%
|
|
84+/84+SE
|
26
|
22.8%
|
|
85/86
|
9
|
7.9%
|
|
89/89Ti
|
39
|
34.2%
|
|
92/92+/v200
|
24
|
21.1%
|
|
|
Re: If you were a calculator, which would you be?
|
Astrid Smith
(Web Page)
|
Thanks to Nikky for the survey idea.
|
Reply to this comment
|
26 January 2008, 07:32 GMT
|
|
Re: If you were a calculator, which would you be?
|
Brandon Wilson
(Web Page)
|
The 73, because it's a wonderful calculator (an 83+ in disguise) with lots of untapped potential and undocumented stuff.
|
Reply to this comment
|
26 January 2008, 07:41 GMT
|
|
Re: If you were a calculator, which would you be?
|
j-z-d
|
obviously not many people have voted, because when I voted, the 84+/SE section went up from 16.7 to 28.6
|
Reply to this comment
|
26 January 2008, 14:46 GMT
|
|
Re: If you were a calculator, which would you be?
|
romeopascal84
|
I chose 85/86 because though they are "outdated", they are still very popular. Likewise, I can't keep up with new trends, but I'm still one of the better known in my school.
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 January 2008, 02:32 GMT
|
|
Re: If you were a calculator, which would you be?
|
U.S.Games
|
TI 84+, because that is a newer version of the TI-83... which is really popular... and because I have one... :-)
|
Reply to this comment
|
27 January 2008, 23:52 GMT
|
|
1 2
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|