Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
0!
|
17
|
5.8%
|
|
1!
|
8
|
2.7%
|
|
0
|
191
|
65.6%
|
|
pi
|
3
|
1.0%
|
|
ln(i)
|
17
|
5.8%
|
|
1
|
8
|
2.7%
|
|
Huh?
|
47
|
16.2%
|
|
|
Re: e^(pi*i) + 1 =
|
Patrick Stetter
(Web Page)
|
Doh! the instant I read it I knew the answer was 0, but I chose 0! becuase I mistook the factorial symbol for an exlclamation point. I hope that's the reason other people are choosing 0!. I thought it was a well known fact that e to the pi i was -1!!!
|
Reply to this comment
|
16 May 2005, 22:25 GMT
|
|
Re: e^(pi*i) + 1 =
|
Jason Malinowski
|
Since I'm sure that most people here just know that you can plug this into your calculator to get the answer (I won't say it, to avoid spoiling the fun for say, one person). But, the proof (and general case) is actually somewhat nifty (see the link.)
Remember: "Gauss is reported to have commented that if this formula [e^(pi*i)+1=0] was not immediately obvious, the reader would never be a first-class mathematician" (Ripped from Mathworld link above)
|
Reply to this comment
|
17 May 2005, 02:31 GMT
|
|
Re: e^(pi*i) + 1 =
|
leofox
(Web Page)
|
i checked my calc for this, the answer is 0.
I didn't know the exclamation mark was the math exclamation mark. So i answered "The answer is zero!!!!!".
|
Reply to this comment
|
17 May 2005, 18:45 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|