Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
Known name
|
2
|
3.8%
|
|
Cool name
|
2
|
3.8%
|
|
Many calculators
|
3
|
5.8%
|
|
Lots of time
|
36
|
69.2%
|
|
Good programmer
|
9
|
17.3%
|
|
|
Re: What do you think we did look for in new archivers?
|
chemoautotroph
(Web Page)
|
1st post!
Good programming is definetely the most to look for
|
Reply to this comment
|
1 March 2003, 20:14 GMT
|
|
Re: What do you think we did look for in new archivers?
|
yougotavirus
(Web Page)
|
I would imagine more time is more important, but of course, that is jusy my opinion. At any rate, this is promising news indeed. Congrats to our new archivers! And so on! etc... etc...
END TRANSMISSION
|
Reply to this comment
|
1 March 2003, 20:28 GMT
|
|
Re: What do you think we did look for in new archivers?
|
Barrett Anderson
(Web Page)
|
definitely not good grammar skills
(no offense, but the 2nd one has a mistake on the first word in the about thingy)
|
Reply to this comment
|
1 March 2003, 20:40 GMT
|
|
Re: What do you think we did look for in new archivers?
|
Cuddles
|
Well, almost everyone in the world (...) voted for time here, so I'm guessing time. I would hope that a number of poeple that big could be correct about a question like this.
|
Reply to this comment
|
1 March 2003, 22:02 GMT
|
|
1 2
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|