Results
|
Choice
|
Votes
|
|
Percent
|
5
|
27
|
13.6%
|
|
4
|
7
|
3.5%
|
|
3
|
10
|
5.0%
|
|
2
|
8
|
4.0%
|
|
1
|
7
|
3.5%
|
|
Michael?
|
60
|
30.2%
|
|
Hat?
|
80
|
40.2%
|
|
|
Re: Michael\'s Hat?
|
lord_nightrose
(Web Page)
|
I give it a 5 out of 5. I also liked the part about 'lighting stuff on fire'.
You know what's odd... If I were to lose about 50-60 pounds, my face would be very similar (eerily similar) to yours.
|
Reply to this comment
|
24 January 2003, 22:26 GMT
|
|
Re: Michael\'s Hat?
|
no_one_2000_
(Web Page)
|
Um, MichaelV? Could you make a general discussion board? It could be a board that automatically clears itself at the beginning of each week, and it could be uncensored... that way we could all discuss a range of topics to each other. I think that some people visit this site more than they check their e-mail (In a day, the ratio of times I visit ticalc.org to the times I check my mail is averaged around 5:1) Besides, it's more of a community when more than two people can talk to each other at once... and I'm not allowed to chat anymore (@#$@#), so this is my only connection with multiple people I can get... and probably not just me.
If it were to be censored, the only thing that I think that should be cut out is strong profanity or really bad flames.
It seems that discussion isn't as lively when it's strictly on-topic, so that's why I thought we could have our on-topic discussion (the news), and then, our general discussion: all topics, anything.
I don't know where else to ask this question, because I assume that the ticalc.org staff views the news more commonly then their e-mail. (I do)
This could make both sides happy, and we wouldn't need to worry as much about off-topic posts cluttering up the news.
Could something like this be set up? That would really be great. Thanks for reading this,
no_one_2000_
|
Reply to this comment
|
25 January 2003, 01:05 GMT
|
|
Re: Michael's Hat?
|
Gerhalt
|
Lol, well I havent seen his hat, but hey since I imagine
it looks... uhmm... interesting... I'll give it a 4 lol.
Gerhalt
|
Reply to this comment
|
25 January 2003, 01:44 GMT
|
|
Re: Michael\'s Hat?
|
Talamond
|
Mr. Vincent, you have just inspired me to put a jester character in my RPG. As such, I have come to the conclusion that you are a very bad influence and should be taken out and shot, after which I will come and steal your awesome hat.
|
Reply to this comment
|
29 January 2003, 23:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Michael\'s Hat?
|
Talamond
|
Ah, but my rating was of the HAT, not the whole picture!
If you want me to rate the picture, then here you go:
This piece is a collection of various ideas sewn together to form a whole. The books in the background symbolize intelligence. The hat, when viewed as being worn on one with a serious (and slightly evil-looking) expression, represents the clash between the desire to have fun and the natural fear of looking ridiculous in the minds of staring eyes (symbolized by the background light.) As a result, the bearer of the hat is conflicted, as is shown by his mouth. He is wanting to smile, but his consuming fear prevents him from expressing the fullness of his emotions.
Overall, this is a very remarkable piece. I give it a 4.8.
|
Reply to this comment
|
30 January 2003, 02:58 GMT
|
|
1 2 3 4 5
You can change the number of comments per page in Account Preferences.
|