Re: x=@n3*PI

[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]

Re: x=@n3*PI

In article <36B07AA1.16E9@uh.edu>,
          Fisher@uh.edu (Glenn Fisher) wrote:

] Try:
] cSolve(e^(sin(x))=1,x)
] after clearing your home screen.  This resets the x in @nx to 1.
] Then enter:
] ans(1)|@n1=0 and @n2=1
] Then try any values you want where @n1=@n2 and you will not find the
] above roots.
] That's because it requires two arbitrary integers to represent all
] of the roots.

Yes, I'm fairly clear about this (thanks); it's just the clunky nature of
@n78, etc. that I'm railing at I suppose.  Another poster kindly pointed out
that the simple use of "m" and "n" as in most text books wouldn't work as
they might already be defined, but how about more elegant reserved variables
than @n156, such as italic "m" or "n"?

Oh well, I think we've done this one now! :-)

Dick


--
=============================================================================
Dick Smith                                           dick@risctex.demon.co.uk
Acorn Risc PC                                  http://www.risctex.demon.co.uk
=============================================================================
Follow-Ups: References: