Re: Volume of a 3d figure

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Volume of a 3d figure
From: pucufREMOVE@YAHOO.COM
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 01:14:16 GMT
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
References: <77p7kt$egr$1@winter.news.rcn.net> <19990116023904.20059.00001541@ng-fd1.aol.com>
Reply-To: pucufREMOVE@YAHOO.COM
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27404

Uh, did that have to do with the previous message, or is your
statement jsut random noise?

On 16 Jan 1999 07:39:04 GMT, stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:

>89s can do symbolic and numeric integration. Just numerically integrate Pi
>F(x)^2 from A to B. Not that hard. For arc length, numerically integrate
>sqrt(1+F ' (x)) from A to B.
>
>-*---*-------
>S.T.L.  ==> STL137@aol.com <==  My quotes page is at:  http://quote.cjb.net
>~~~ My main website is at:  http://137.tsx.org ~~~
>If you see a message of mine posted on two newsgroups, then it is because I
>have replied to a crossposted message. I *never* crosspost of my own accord!
>I block all unapproved E-mail. If you wish to talk to me, post to alt.test.9
>with the subject "Moo" and your E-mail address in the body. I will allow you
>as soon as I sign on next.
>"This universe is not hostile, or yet is it friendly. It is simply
>indifferent" - John H. Holmes, The Sensible Man's View of Religion
>

References:

Volume of a 3d figure

From: Matt Weintraub <neda@EROLS.COM>

Re: Volume of a 3d figure

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>