Re: Which TI should I get?

To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
Subject: Re: Which TI should I get?
From: tomgREMOVETHIS@NORTHCOAST.COM
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 00:32:34 GMT
Organization: Posted via RemarQ, http://www.remarQ.com - Discussions start here!
References: <369ea9f8.34243597@news.northcoast.com> <19990116023520.20059.00001539@ng-fd1.aol.com>
Reply-To: tomgREMOVETHIS@NORTHCOAST.COM
Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:27403

The fact remains, that particular application happens faster on an HP.
Even when you claim to use better methods.
What I can't figure out, however, is how all this fits in with your
statement from 12/27 that  "Beat PRIME6 - then I'll agree that HPs are
intrinsically
faster than TIs. "
They did.  Are you a man of your word?

On 16 Jan 1999 07:35:20 GMT, stl137@aol.com (STL137) wrote:

><<That's your algorithm and TI slowness at work.>>
>Auugh. As I've said REPEATEDLY, Wheel Factorization is better than Baby Trial
>Divide but worse than some of the more esoteric selections in Number Theory.
>I'm sure you can't do better yourself.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Which TI should I get?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>

References:

Re: Which TI should I get?

From: tomgNOSPAM@NORTHCOAST.COM

Re: Which TI should I get?

From: STL137 <stl137@AOL.COM>