Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world

Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world

• To: CALC-TI@LISTS.PPP.TI.COM
• Subject: Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world
• From: Wesley <moore.w@HOTKEY.NET.AU>
• Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 23:43:54 +1000
• Cache-Post-Path: woody.hotkey.net.au!unknown@sunb-dial1-1.vic.hotkey.net.au
• Organization: Hotkey Internet Services Pty Ltd
• References: <7e02si$j0k$1@usenet01.srv.cis.pitt.edu> <370BA35D.2F4EC9BF@baladyne.com> <370CAD73.9C068277@nku.edu> <MEMR2.1102$vl5.122240@dfiatx1-snr1>
• Reply-To: Wesley <moore.w@HOTKEY.NET.AU>
• Xref: paladin.american.edu bit.listserv.calc-ti:28778

My name <x@x.x> wrote in message MEMR2.1102$vl5.122240@dfiatx1-snr1">news:MEMR2.1102$vl5.122240@dfiatx1-snr1...
> Is that possibly why the TI-89 seems to go through batteries a little
faster
> than my 83?  It is 4 MHz faster?

And it's an entirely different processor. Z-80 (in the 83) and (MC68000 in
the 89).

******************************************************************
* To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email TO: listserv@lists.ppp.ti.com
* with a message (not the subject) that reads SIGNOFF CALC-TI
*
* Archives at http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/calc-ti.html
******************************************************************

• From:
• Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world
• From: Adam Davis <adavis@BALADYNE.COM>
• Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world
• From: "Daniel J. Curtin" <curtin@NKU.EDU>
• Re: Death of TI' short run at the top of th ecalculator world
• From: My name <x@X.X>

• Prev: Swap???
• Next: Re: ti-86 vs. ti-89
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread